green
Positive treatment
9.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Thomas v. State
But see United States v. Hamilton, 107 F.3d 499, 504 (7th Cir.1997) ("it is unclear whether the Confrontation Clause applies to pretrial competency hearings"), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2528 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1997). [8] Even assuming, arguendo, that Thomas had a due process right to cross-examine the authors of the Taylor Hardin report, see People v. Williams, 123 Mich.App. at 759-60 , 333 N.W.2d at 581 , Thomas has failed to meet his burden of establishing that counsel were ineffective for failing to object to the lack of opportunity to cross-examine.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Deny Mitrovich
See United States v. Hamilton, 107 F.3d 499 , 509 n.5 (7th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 (1997) (explaining that “Rule 16(a)(1)(C) imposes upon the federal government no duty to obtain documents that are controlled by the state government or police, even if the prosecution is aware of the items”); see also United States v. Marshall, 132 F.3d 63, 68 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schlueter
See United States v. Hamilton, 107 F.3d 499, 506-08 (7th Cir.) (assuming arguendo that use of telephonic testimony at competency hearing violated Sixth Amendment right to confrontation in concluding that any error was harmless), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2528 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Noyes
See Collins v. FMHA-USDA, 105 F.3d 1366, 1368 (11th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2528 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1997); Brophy v. Chase Manhattan Mortg.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
See United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1163 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Allen Jackson
See United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1163 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2527 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Commonwealth
See United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1150 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2527 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1997) (addressing the authentication, under FRE 901, of a card purported to have been written by the defendant).
cited
Cited "see"
Wolf v. Ramsey
Accord United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1160-61 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2527 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carnes
See United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1161-65 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2527 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donte Devell Dupree
See United States v. Hatchcock, 103 F.3d 715 , 720 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 521 U.S. 1127 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America v. Donte Devell Dupree, Also Known as Lonnie Devell Lenow
See United States v. Hathcock, 103 F.3d 715, 720 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2528 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Detroit Newspapers
See United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1153 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2527 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re the Personal Restraint of Benn
See United States v. Hamilton, 107 F.3d 499 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 (1997); Hoke v. Netherland, 92 F.3d 1350 (4th Cir. 1996); Mills v. Singletary, 63 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 1995); United States v. Willis, 997 F.2d 407 (8th Cir. 1993); United States v. Perdomo, 929 F.2d 967 (3d Cir. 1991); see also California v. Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 , 104 S. Ct. 2528 , 81 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson-Gibson v. Beasley
The factors “may be of limited utility in the context of non-scientific expert testimony.” First Tenn. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Barreto, 268 F.3d 319, 334 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1158 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 (1997)); see also id. (quoting Berry v. City of Detroit, 25 F.3d 1342, 1349 (6th Cir. 1994) , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 (1995)) (recognizing that “‘the distinction between scientific and non-scientific expert testimony is a critical one’ and that Daubert is ‘only of limited help’ in assessing technical or experiential ex…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
AFT Michigan v. Project Veritas
Daubert’s factors “may be of limited utility in the context of non-scientific expert testimony.” First Tenn. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Barreto, 268 F.3d 319, 334 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1158 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 (1997)); see also id. (quoting Berry v. City of Detroit, 25 F.3d 1342, 1349 (6th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 (1995)) (recognizing that “‘the distinction between scientific and non-scientific expert testimony is a critical one’ and that Daubert is ‘only of limited help’ in assessing technical or experien…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonard I. Payne
“This standard is consistent with the Supreme Court’s admonition in General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 142 , 118 S.Ct. 512 , 139 L.Ed.2d 508 (1997), that we review evidentiary decisions for an abuse of discretion, because it is an abuse of discretion to make errors of law or clear errors of factual determination.” Id.; see also United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1153-54 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2527 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1997). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Payne
“This standard is consistent with the Supreme Court’s admonition in General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 142 (1997), that we review evidentiary decisions for an abuse of discretion, because it is an abuse of discretion to make errors of law or clear errors of factual determination.” Id.; see also United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1153-54 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 (1997). 2.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sharon Neeley
See e.g., United States v. Draves, 103 F.3d 1328, 1335-36 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 (1997); Boyles, 57 F.3d at 550 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tyransee A. Harris
See, e.g., United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1156 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2527 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1997); United States v. *589 Thomas, 74 F.3d 676, 681 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1162 , 116 S.Ct. 1558 , 134 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996); Berry v. City of Detroit, 25 F.3d 1342, 1350 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1111 , 115 S.Ct. 902 , 130 L.Ed.2d 786 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Neeley
See e.g., United States v. Draves, 103 F.3d 1328, 1335-36 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2528 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1997); Boyles, 57 F.3d at 550 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roberts v. Bowersox
In order to preserve a claim for federal habeas corpus review, petitioner must have presented the claim on federal constitutional grounds to the state courts, relying upon "a specific federal constitutional right, a particular constitutional provision, a federal constitutional case, or a state case raising a pertinent federal constitutional issue." Kelly v. Trickey, 844 F.2d 557, 558 (8th Cir.1988) (internal quotations omitted); see also McDonald v. Bowersox, 101 F.3d 588, 598 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2527 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1997); McCall v. Benson, 114 F.3d 754…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Michael Iannone
A (Nov.1995)); see also United States v. Haut, 107 F.3d 213, 218 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2528 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1028 , and cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 130 , 139 L.Ed.2d 80 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De Varon
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Haut, 107 F.3d 213, 217-18 (3d Cir.) (“We are mindful that ‘[a] simple statement by the district court’ together with some supporting facts of record concerning a defendant’s status as a minimal participant is ‘typically sufficient to settle the question.’ ”) (citations omitted), ce rt. denied, 521 U.S. 1127 , 117 S.Ct. 2528 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1028 and — U.S.—, 118 S.Ct. 130 , 139 L.Ed.2d 80 (1997); United States v. Edwards, 98 F.3d 1364, 1370 (D.C.Cir.1996) (holding that district court need not “use magic words ‘relative culpability’ or ... make …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Medina-Alfonso
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-9151.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1997.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.