green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Chez
“Once a question of the reasonableness of counsel’s fees is raised by a party in interest bringing a motion, the attorney bears the burden of proving his fee was reasonable.” In re Wood, 408 B.R. 841, 848 (Bankr.D.Kan.2009); see also Snyder v. Dewoskin (In re Mahendra), 131 F.3d 750, 757 (8th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 523 U.S. 1107 , 118 S.Ct. 1678 , 140 L.Ed.2d 815 (1998). 15 2.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fiegen Law Firm, P.C. v. Fokkena (In Re On-Line Services Ltd.)
See, e.g., Snyder v. Dewoskin (In re Mahendra), 131 F.3d 750, 755 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied 523 U.S. 1107 , 118 S.Ct. 1678 , 140 L.Ed.2d 815 (1998). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: Robert G. Zepecki, Debtor. Steven C.R. Brown v. James C. Luker
See 11 U.S.C. § 329 (a), (b); see also Snyder v. Dewoskin (In re Mahendra), 131 F.3d 750, 757 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1107 , 118 S.Ct. 1678 , 140 L.Ed.2d 815 (1998). “ ‘In contemplation of generally denotes that the impelling cause of the transaction is influenced by the possibility or imminence of a bankruptcy proceeding.” In re Telemaintenance, Inc., 157 B.R. 352, 354 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1993) (citing Tripp v. Mitschrich, 211 F. 424 (8th Cir.1914)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Steven C.R. Brown v. James C. Luker
See 11 U.S.C. § 329 (a), (b); see also Snyder v. Dewoskin (In re Mahendra), 131 F.3d 750, 757 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1107 (1998). '''In contemplation of' generally denotes that the impelling cause of the transaction is influenced by the possibility or imminence of a bankruptcy proceeding." In re Telemaintenance, Inc., 157 B.R. 352, 354 (Bankr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Welch
See, e.g., Snyder v. Dewoskin (In re Mahendra), 131 F.3d 750, 756 (8th Cir.1997) (attorney for chapter 7 debt- or was not due fees from estate for post-petition services when attorney did not seek permission to be employed by estate), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1107 , 118 S.Ct. 1678 , 140 L.Ed.2d 815 (1998); In re Grabill Corp., 983 F.2d 773, 777 (7th Cir.1993) (attorneys found ineligible to serve were not entitled to compensation for work performed for debtor); Canatella v. Towers (In re Alcala), 918 F.2d 99, 104 (9th Cir.1990) (attorney who pursued debtor’s pre-petition cause of action without…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Crawford & Co.
v.
Sonnier
v.
Sonnier
No. 97-1426.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 4, 1998.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.