green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Haselrig v. United States
But see Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1321-22 (Fed.Cir.1998), reh'g denied and en banc suggestion declined, cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Levy v. United States
See Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 322 , 594 F.2d 824 (Ct.Cl.1979).” Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1312 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999); see also Clinton v. Goldsmith, 526 U.S. 529, 539 , 119 S.Ct. 1538 , 143 L.Ed.2d 720 (1999) (holding “that ‘[BCMR] decisions are subject to judicial review [by federal courts] and can be set aside if they are arbitrary, capricious, or not based on substantial evidence.’” (quoting Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 303 , 103 S.Ct. 2362 , 76 L.Ed.2d 586 , (1983)) (alterations in original…
cited
Cited "see"
Wisotsky v. United States
See Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 322 , 594 F.2d 824 (1979).” Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1312 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Sanders v. City of Montgomery
Accord, Walker v. Mortham, 158 F.3d 1177, 1186 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 39 , 145 L.Ed.2d 36 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Edward Lebrun
(2×)
See United States v. Unser, 165 F.3d 755, 766 (10th Cir.) (noting that use of a cellular phone during an interview is a factor supporting a finding of no custody), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 40 , 145 L.Ed.2d 36 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael LeBrun
See United States v. Unser, 165 F.3d 755, 766 (10th Cir.) (noting that use of a cellular phone during an interview is a factor supporting a finding of no custody), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Phillips v. Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc.
Accord, Walker v. Mortham, 158 F.3d 1177, 1186 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 39 , 145 L.Ed.2d 36 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Hoffman v. United States
See Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 322 , 594 F.2d 824 (1979).” Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1312 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Edward Lebrun
(2×)
See United States v. Unser, 165 F.3d 755, 766 (10th Cir.) (noting that use of a cellular phone during an interview is a factor supporting a finding of no custody), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 40 , 145 L.Ed.2d 36 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael LeBrun
See United States v. Unser, 165 F.3d 755, 766 (10th Cir.) (noting that use of a cellular phone during an interview is a factor supporting a finding of no custody), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hanley v. Sports Authority
(2×)
See Walker v. Mortham, 158 F.3d 1177, 1192 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 39 , 145 L.Ed.2d 36 (1999); see also Paldano v. Althin Med., Inc., 974 F.Supp. 1441, 1446 (S.D.Fla.1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hanley v. the Sports Authority
See Walker v. Mortham, 158 F.3d 1177 , 1192 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 39 , 145 L.Ed.2d 36 (1999); see also Paldano v. Althin Med., Inc., 974 F.Supp. 1441, 1446 (S.D.Fla. 1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lockwood v. United States
In this regard, the United States Supreme Court has stated that, “judges are not given the task of running the [Service branch] ... [T]he military constitutes a specialized community governed by a separate discipline from that of the civilian.” Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93-94 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 , reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 779 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953); see also Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1316 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brookins v. Untied States
The United States Supreme Court has confirmed that “judges are not given the task of running the Army____ The military constitutes a specialized community governed by a separate discipline from that of the civilian.” Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93, 94 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 , reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 779 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953); see also Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1316 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wingert v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.
See e.g., Albertson’s, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, 157 F.3d 758 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Albertson's, Inc.
v.
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, AFL-CIO and CLC
v.
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, AFL-CIO and CLC
No. 98-1270.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.