Timmons v. United States, 537 U.S. 1004 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Timmons v. United States, 537 U.S. 1004 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
57 citation events (57 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Rockford (nj, 2013-04-23) · Strongest negative: Paula McFarland v. Joan Yukins (ca6, 2004-01-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Paula McFarland v. Joan Yukins
6th Cir. · 2004 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Martin v. Mitchell, 280 F.3d 594, 615 (6th Cir.2002) (holding that petitioner who failed to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel on direct appeal had therefore “failed to develop the factual basis” of that claim, even though petitioner argued that failure was due to ineffective assistance of appellate counsel), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1004 , 123 S.Ct. 515 , 154 L.Ed.2d 401 (2002) and — U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 2601 , 156 L.Ed.2d 624 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Rockford
N.J. · 2013 · signal: accord · confidence high
See United States v. Combs, 394 F.3d 739, 744 , amended by 412 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that under certain circumstances knocking "is not invariably required by the Fourth Amendment”); accord United States v. Mendoza, 281 F.3d 712, 716-17 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1004 , 123 S.Ct. 515 , 154 L.Ed.2d 401 (2002); United States v. Dunnock, 295 F.3d 431, 435 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1037 , 123 S.Ct. 570 , 154 L.Ed.2d. 457 (2002); United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730, 732-33 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985); United States…
discussed Cited "see" McPherson v. US Parole Commission
4th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(1) (2000); see Madley v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 278 F.3d 1306, 1309-10 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1004 , 123 S.Ct. 515 , 154 L.Ed.2d 401 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Thomas Cameron Kincade
9th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Guagliardo, 278 F.3d 868, 873 (9th Cir.2002) (affirming the validity of a probation term authorizing a warrantless search at any time by any officer, "as long as the search was supported by reasonable suspicion”), cer t. denied, 537 U.S. 1004 , 123 S.Ct. 515 , 154 L.Ed.2d 401 ; United States v. Davis, 932 F.2d 752, 758 (9th Cir.1991) ("The permissible bounds of a probation search are governed by a reasonable suspicion standard.”); United States v. Giannetta, 909 F.2d 571, 576 (1st Cir.1990); United States v. Reyes, 283 F.3d 446, 462 (2d Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Penalber
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Mendoza, 281 F. 3d 712, 715 (8th Cir.) (two-unit apartment), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1004 , 123 S.Ct. 515 , 154 L.Ed. 2d 401 (2002); United States v. Acosta, 965 F. 2d 1248, 1251-53 (3d Cir.1992) (three-unit apartment).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Harwell
D. Kan. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
“The prevailing view in most federal circuits is that entry through open doors by law enforcement agents executing a search warrant does not implicate the ‘knock and announce’ statute.” United States v. Williams, 2005 WL 2127597 , at *9 (E.D.Mich.2005) (citing United States v. Gatewood, 60 F.3d 248, 250 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1001 , 116 S.Ct. 546 , 133 L.Ed.2d 448 (1995); United States v. Salter, 815 F.2d 1150, 1152 (7th Cir.1987); United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985); United States v. Philli…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Larry J. Leaf, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of John P. Leaf, Deceased, Martha A. Leaf, John P. Leaf v. Ronald Shelnutt
7th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Mendoza, 281 F.3d 712, 717 (8th Cir.) (holding that police had acted consistently with purposes underlying the knock and announce principle, even when no knock was given, when officers shouted warning and door already was off its hinges), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1004 , 123 S.Ct. 515 , 154 L.Ed.2d 401 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Leaf, Larry J. v. Shelnutt, Ronald
7th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Mendoza, 281 F.3d 712, 717 (8th Cir.) (holding that police had acted consistently with purposes underlying the knock and announce principle, even when no knock was given, when officers shouted warning and door already was off its hinges), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1004 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Timmons
v.
United States
02-5701.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 4, 2002.
537 U.S. 1004
Published

537 U.S. 1004

TIMMONS
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 02-5701.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 4, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 283 F. 3d 1246.