Matias v. United States, 537 U.S. 884 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Matias v. United States, 537 U.S. 884 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ahmed v. Napolitano (mad, 2012-12-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ahmed v. Napolitano
D. Mass. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Millbrook v. IBP, Inc., 280 F.3d 1169, 1178-79 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 884 , 123 S.Ct. 117 , 154 L.Ed.2d 143 (2002); Deines v. Tex. Dep’t of Protective & Regulatory Servs., 164 F.3d 277 , 280-82 (5th Cir.1999).
discussed Cited "see" Rudin, Janine v. Lincoln Land Communi
7th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Millbrook v. IBP, Inc., 280 F.3d 1169, 1174 (7th Cir.) (holding that question at trial is whether there is sufficient evidence to support a finding that the employer discriminated against the plaintiff based on the protected ground), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 884 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Janine Rudin v. Lincoln Land Community College
7th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Millbrook v. IBP, Inc., 280 F.3d 1169, 1174 (7th Cir.) (holding that question at trial is whether there is sufficient evidence to support a finding that the employer discriminated against the plaintiff based on the protected ground), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 884 , 123 S.Ct. 117 , 154 L.Ed.2d 143 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Rathbun v. Autozone, Inc.
1st Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Millbrook v. IBP, Inc., 280 F.3d 1169, 1178-79 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 884 , 123 S.Ct. 117 , 154 L.Ed.2d 143 (2002); Deines v. Tex. Dep’t of Protective & Regulatory Servs., 164 F.3d 277 , 280-82 (5th Cir.1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Poulos v. Caesars World, Inc.
9th Cir. · 2004 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Sikes v. Teleline, Inc., 281 F.3d 1350, 1359-60 (11th Cir.2002) (requiring that "when a plaintiff brings a civil RICO case predicated upon mail or wire fraud, he must prove that ... he relied to his detriment on misrepresentations made in furtherance of that scheme”) (internal quotation marks omitted), ce rt. denied, 537 U.S. 884 , 123 S.Ct. 117 , 154 L.Ed.2d 143 (2002), and County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co., 907 F.2d 1295, 1311 (2d Cir.1990) (requiring demonstration of reliance in Civil RICO claims predicated on mail fraud), and Brandenburg v. Seidel, 859 F.2d 1179 , 118…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Desmond Christian
7th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Martin, 287 F.3d 609, 621 (7th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 884 , 123 S.Ct. 116 , 154 L.Ed.2d 142 (2002) (noting the court may accept a plea agreement that includes dismissal of any charges so long as the court determines that the remaining charges adequately reflect the seriousness of the actual offense behavior and that accepting the agreement will not undermine the statutory purposes of sentencing or the sentencing guidelines).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Matias
v.
United States
02-5442.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
537 U.S. 884
Published

537 U.S. 884

MATIAS
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 02-5442.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 7, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 287 F. 3d 609.