green
Positive treatment
Trending · 55 recent citers
12.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Glenn
(2×)
See State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178, 216 , 570 S.E.2d 440, 461 (2002) (noting that “[a]n indigent defendant has no right to replace appointed counsel merely because the defendant is dissatisfied with the present attorney’s work or because of a disagreement over trial tactics.”), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 986 , 155 L.Ed. 2d 681 (2003).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Locklear
(4×)
See State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178, 218 , 570 S.E.2d 440, 462 (2002) (concluding that, “[b]ecause the attorneys described in general terms what had been done, rather than disclosing any of their mental processes, there was no work product violation” (citation omitted)), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 986 , 155 L.
examined
Cited "see"
Kor Xiong v. Marks
(4×)
See State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178, 236 , 570 S.E.2d 440, 472 (2002) (“Decisions concerning which defenses to pursue are matters of trial strategy and are not generally second-guessed by this Court.”), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 986 , 155 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Street
(2×)
See State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178, 216 , 570 S.E.2d 440, 461 (2002) ("When a defendant makes a motion for new counsel, if it appears the present attorney is reasonably competent and there is no conflict between attorney and client that renders the attorney incompetent, the motion for new counsel must be denied.") (citing State v. Anderson, 350 N.C. 152,167 , 513 S.E.2d 296, 305-06 (1999)), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 986 , 155 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Morgan
(2×)
See State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178, 256 , 570 S.E.2d 440, 483 (2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 986 , 155 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Thompson
(2×)
See State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178 , 266, 570 S.E.2d 440 , 489 (2002) (concluding that nothing in the prosecutor's argument that the defendant signed his own death warrant in the victim's blood "relieves the jury of its responsibility of fairness and impartiality"), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 986 , 155 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Morgan
(2×)
See State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178 , 256, 570 S.E.2d 440 , 483 (2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 986 , 155 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Thompson
(2×)
See State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178, 266 , 570 S.E.2d 440, 489 (2002) (concluding that nothing in the prosecutor’s argument that the defendant signed his own death warrant in the victim’s blood “relieves the jury of its responsibility of fairness and impartiality”), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 986 , 155 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tirado
(2×)
See State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178 , 570 S.E.2d 440 (2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 986 , 123 S.Ct. 1800 , 155 L.Ed.2d 681 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tirado
(2×)
See State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178 , 570 S.E.2d 440 (2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 986 , 155 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Glasco
See State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178 , 570 S.E.2d 440 (2002), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 155 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Holloman
(2×)
See Hutchins, 303 N.C. at 335 , 279 S.E.2d at 797 ; see also State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178, 216 , 570 S.E.2d 440, 461 (2002) (“An indigent defendant has no right to replace appointed counsel merely because the defendant is dissatisfied with the present attorney’s work or because of a disagreement over trial tactics.”), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 986 , 155 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Campbell
(2×)
Ed. 2d 73 (2002); see also State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178, 236 , 570 S.E.2d 440, 472 (2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 986 , 155 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Al-Bayyinah
(2×)
Ed. 2d 73 (2002); see also State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178, 235-36 , 570 S.E.2d 440, 471-72 (2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 986 , 155 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Roache
Ed. 2d 73 (2002); see also State v. Prevatte, 356 N.C. 178, 236 , 570 S.E.2d 440, 472 (2002), cert. denied, *280 - U.S. -, 155 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Childress
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
02-9118.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 2003.
Cited by 46 opinions | Published
CHILDRESS
v.
COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL.
No. 02-9118.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 21, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 51 Fed. Appx. 930.