green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Crispino v. Allard
See Williams, 529 U.S. at 412 , 120 S.Ct. 1495 (The phrase “‘clearly established Federal law’ ... refers to the holdings, as opposed to the dicta, of this Court’s decisions as of the time of the relevant state-court decision.”); accord Parsad v. Greiner, 337 F.3d 175, 181 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1091 , 124 S.Ct. 962 , 157 L.Ed.2d 798 (2003); see generally 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arbelaez v. State
This Court has repeatedly held that "[t]he contemporaneous objection rule applies to Espinosa error, i.e., a specific objection on the form of the instruction must be made to the trial court to preserve the issue for appeal." Hodges v. State, 619 So.2d 272, 273 (Fla.), cert. denied 510 U.S. 996 , 114 S.Ct. 560 , 126 L.Ed.2d 460 (1993); see also Nelson v. State, 850 So.2d 514, 525 (Fla.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1091 , 124 S.Ct. 961 , 157 L.Ed.2d 797 (2003); Melendez v. State, 612 So.2d 1366 (Fla.1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sharwell
v.
Kaiser Permanente
v.
Kaiser Permanente
No. 03-6725.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 2003.
540 U.S. 1091
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.