Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Williams, 556 U.S. 178 (2009). · Go Syfert
Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Williams, 556 U.S. 178 (2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (59 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Cited for
129 S. Ct. at 1445 Interpreting congressional omission regarding legislative intent2 citing cases
  • Applicability of Tax Levies to Thrift Sav. Plan Accounts (OLC 2010).published 2 cites
    In any event, we cannot presume that, contrary to the other considerations of text and history discussed above, Congress’s omission of an “except as” clause included in another provision and originally included in the Senate bill signals t…
  • Applicability of Tax Levies Under 26 U.S.C. § 6334 to Thrift Sav. Plan Accounts (OLC 2010).published 2 cites
    In any event, we cannot presume that, contrary to the other considerations of text and history discussed above, Congress’s omission of an “except as” clause included in another provision and originally included in the Senate bill signals t…
Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Philip Morris USA Inc.
v.
Williams
07-1216.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 2009.
Published opinion
556 U.S. 178
2009 U.S. LEXIS 2493
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 556 U. S. ____ (2009) 1
[*~178–180]

Per Curiam

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

[*~179–180]

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

_________________

No. 07–1216 _________________

PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., PETITIONER v. MAYOLA

WILLIAMS, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ES-

TATE OF JESSE D. WILLIAMS, DECEASED

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON

[March 31, 2009]

PER CURIAM. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.