Requirements for class certification under code
226 California opinions cite these pages1968–20269 pages cited by California courts
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Requirements for class certification under code
- Cited for: Requirements for class certification and representative adequacy
- Cited for: Determining class certification requirements and conflicts
- Cited for: Requirements for class certification: ascertainable class and community of interest
- Cited for: Reviewing class certification discretion and standing requirements
- Cited for: Conditional class certification requirements and limitations
- Cited for: Examining predominance and class certification requirements
- Cited for: Distinguishing standing from class certification requirements
- Cited for: Determining class certification requirements and predominance
- Cited for: Establishing class certification requirements and burdens
- Cited for: Determining class certification requirements and discretion
- Cited for: Determining class certification requirements and scope of review
Ranked by citing opinions across all courts; a California-first ranking is coming. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
California opinions citing these pages
- Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc., 541 P.3d 466 (Cal. 2024)
- Hefczyz v. Rady Child.'s Hosp., No. D071264 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 17, 2017)
- Gray v. AT&T ca2/5, No. B249701 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2015)
- Boggs v. Franchise Tax Bd., No. B245446 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 19, 2014)
- Duran v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Assn., 325 P.3d 916 (Cal. 2014)
- Thompson v. Auto. Club of S. California, 217 Cal. App. 4th 719 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)
- Bluford v. Safeway Inc., 216 Cal. App. 4th 864 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)
- Sotelo v. Medianews Grp., Inc., 207 Cal. App. 4th 639 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, 273 P.3d 513 (Cal. 2012)
- Am. Honda Motor Co. v. Superior Court, 199 Cal. App. 4th 1367 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)
- Soderstedt v. CBIZ S. California, LLC, 197 Cal. App. 4th 133 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)
- In re Baycol Cases I & II, 248 P.3d 681 (Cal. 2011)
- SEVIDAL v. Target Corp., 189 Cal. App. 4th 905 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)
- Arenas v. El Torito Restaurants, Inc., 183 Cal. App. 4th 723 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 27 opinions
- 11 opinions
- 12 opinions
- 66 opinions
- 7 opinions
- 9 opinions
- 6 opinions
- 60 opinions
Filed under: Class Certification Requirements Under Rule 23
Where else it is alive
Federal 562FL 27TX 27NY 25KY 18GA 10IL 6CO 5AL 4MO 4DC 3LA 3NJ 3PA 3WV 3DE 2MD 2NM 2AK 1IA 1MT 1NC 1NV 1UT 1
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law