Cal. Codes » Family Code / DIVISION 12. PARENT AND CHILD RELATIONSHIP / PART 4. FREEDOM FROM PARENTAL CUSTODY AND CONTROL / CHAPTER 2. Circumstances Where Proceeding May Be Brought
California Codes

Cal. Family Code § 7827 (2026)

Circumstances Where Proceeding May Be Brought

✓ leginfo export of Sept. 26, 2026 (applied Oct. 1, 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)“Mentally disabled” as used in this section means that a parent or parents suffer a mental incapacity or disorder that renders the parent or parents unable to care for and control the child adequately.

(b)A proceeding under this part may be brought if the child is one whose parent or parents are mentally disabled and are likely to remain so in the foreseeable future.

(c)Except as provided in subdivision (d), the evidence of any two experts, each of whom shall be a physician and surgeon, certified either by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology or under Section 6750 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, a licensed psychologist who has a doctoral degree in psychology and at least five years of postgraduate experience in the diagnosis and treatment of emotional and mental disorders, is required to support a finding under this section. In addition to this requirement, the court shall have the discretion to call a licensed marriage and family therapist, a licensed professional clinical counselor, or a licensed clinical social worker, either of whom shall have at least five years of relevant postlicensure experience, in circumstances in which the court determines that this testimony is in the best interest of the child and is warranted by the circumstances of the particular family or parenting issues involved. However, the court may not call a licensed marriage and family therapist, licensed professional clinical counselor, or licensed clinical social worker pursuant to this section who is the adoption service provider, as defined in Section 8502, of the child who is the subject of the petition to terminate parental rights.

(d)If the parent or parents reside in another state or in a foreign country, the evidence required by this section may be supplied by the affidavits of two experts, each of whom shall be either of the following:

(1)A physician and surgeon who is a resident of that state or foreign country, and who has been certified by a medical organization or society of that state or foreign country to practice psychiatric or neurological medicine.

(2)A licensed psychologist who has a doctoral degree in psychology and at least five years of postgraduate experience in the diagnosis and treatment of emotional and mental disorders and who is licensed in that state or authorized to practice in that country.

(e)If the rights of a parent are sought to be terminated pursuant to this section, and the parent does not have an attorney, the court shall appoint an attorney for the parent pursuant to Article 4 (commencing with Section 7860) of Chapter 3, whether or not a request for the appointment is made by the parent.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2000–2026 · leading case: T. J. v. Superior Court of City & Cnty. of S.F., 21 Cal. App. 5th 1229 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
T. J. v. Superior Court of City & Cnty. of S.F., 21 Cal. App. 5th 1229 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018). “(c)(1); Fam. Code, § 7827 ; In re Rebecca H. (1991) 227 Cal.”
Patricia W. v. Superior Court, 244 Cal. App. 4th 397 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “(Fam. Code, § 7827.) It requires the evidence of “any two experts” who meet specified licensing and credentialing requirements.”
CURTIS F. v. Superior Court, 80 Cal. App. 4th 470 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “(b)(2); Fam.Code, § 7827, subd. (c).) We review petitioner's claim under the substantial evidence test.”
In re Joy M., 99 Cal. App. 4th 11 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “" As relevant, Family Code section 7827, which is a part of the Family Code chapter referenced in section 361.”
SHEILA S. v. Superior Court, 84 Cal. App. 4th 872 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000). “” (Fam. Code, § 7827, subd. (a).) “When it is alleged, pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), that the parent is incapable of utilizing services due to mental disability, the court shall order reunification services unless competent evidence from mental health…”
In re CC, 111 Cal. App. 4th 76 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “" [1] Family Code section 7827 is part of the chapter of the Family Code referred to in Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.”
Crouch v. Smick, 2014 IL App (5th) 140382. · cites it 2× “It further found that Leslie and Daniel proved by clear and convincing evidence that under the statutory requirement of California Family Code section 7827 ( Cal.”
Riverside Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Soc. Servs. v. B. C., 111 Cal. App. 4th 76 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “” 1 Family Code section 7827 is part of the chapter of the Family Code referred to in Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.”
LINDA B. v. Superior Court, 92 Cal. App. 4th 150 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001). “185 ]; Fam. Code, § 7827.) Having submitted no expert evidence, respondent concedes Mother’s first point, but contends that the juvenile court’s order was correct under subdivision (b)(10).”
Orange Cnty. Soc. Servs. Agency v. Joseph B., 99 Cal. App. 4th 11 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “” As relevant, Family Code section 7827, which is a part of the Family Code chapter referenced in section 361.”
In re D.A. ca4/2, No. E081458 (Cal. Ct. App. May 16, 2024). · cites it 3× “4th 872, 880 , quoting Fam. Code, § 7827, disapproved on other grounds in Conservatorship of O.”
C.W. v. Superior Court, No. F088225 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 27, 2024). · cites it 2× “(Fam. Code, § 7827, subd. (a); id., subd. (c).”
Show all 23 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.