Every employer, including the state and any political subdivision, shall provide a reasonable amount of break time to accommodate an employee desiring to express breast milk for the employee’s infant child each time the employee has need to express milk. The break time shall, if possible, run concurrently with any break time already provided to the employee. Break time for an employee that does not run concurrently with the rest time authorized for the employee by the applicable wage order of the Industrial Welfare Commission shall be unpaid.
Notes of Decisions
Gonzales v. Marriott Int'l, Inc., 142 F. Supp. 3d 961 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
· cites it 7× “39 -Marriott contends that the plain language, legislative history, and public policy considerations underlying California Labor Code § 1030 limit the lactation accommodation requirements prescribed by FEHA to employees who express breast milk for their own infant children.”
Salgado v. Iqvia, Inc., 459 F. Supp. 3d 1318 (S.D. Cal. 2020).
“date, (3) failure to engage in the interactive process, (4) retaliation, (5) 3 interference with leave and violations of California’s Pregnancy Disability Leave 4 Law, (6) interference with leave and violations of the California Family Rights Act, 5 (7) failure to investigate…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.