(a)Any person shall be deemed to have predeceased a decedent to the extent provided in subdivision (c) where all of the following apply:
(1)It has been proven by clear and convincing evidence that the person is liable for physical abuse, neglect, or financial abuse of the decedent, who was an elder or dependent adult.
(2)The person is found to have acted in bad faith.
(3)The person has been found to have been reckless, oppressive, fraudulent, or malicious in the commission of any of these acts upon the decedent.
(4)The decedent, at the time those acts occurred and thereafter until the time of his or her death, has been found to have been substantially unable to manage his or her financial resources or to resist fraud or undue influence.
(b)Any person shall be deemed to have predeceased a decedent to the extent provided in subdivision (c) if that person has been convicted of a violation of Section 236 of the Penal Code or any offense described in Section 368 of the Penal Code.
(c)Any person found
liable under subdivision (a) or convicted under subdivision (b) shall not (1) receive any property, damages, or costs that are awarded to the decedent’s estate in an action described in subdivision (a) or (b), whether that person’s entitlement is under a will, a trust, or the laws of intestacy; or (2) serve as a fiduciary as defined in Section 39, if the instrument nominating or appointing that person was executed during the period when the decedent was substantially unable to manage his or her financial resources or resist fraud or undue influence. This section shall not apply to a decedent who, at any time following the act or acts described in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a), or the act or acts described in subdivision (b), was substantially able to manage his or her financial resources and to resist fraud or undue influence within the meaning of subdivision (b) of Section 1801 of the Probate Code and subdivision (b) of Section 39 of the Civil Code.
(d)For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1)“Physical abuse” as defined in Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(2)“Neglect” as defined in Section 15610.57 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(3)“False imprisonment” as defined in Section 368 of the Penal Code.
(4)“Financial abuse” as defined in Section 15610.30 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(e)Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the severance and transfer of an action or proceeding to a separate civil action pursuant to Section 801.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
22
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1946–2025 · leading case:
Lickter v. Lickter, 189 Cal. App. 4th 712 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010).
Lickter v. Lickter, 189 Cal. App. 4th 712 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 7× “) The appellate court concluded that Sheldon’s argument “ignore[d] Probate Code section 259 and the purpose of the Elder Abuse Act.”
In re Est. of Lowrie, 118 Cal. App. 4th 220 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 4× “In that Sheldon was found to be liable for elder abuse, the trial court found that Sheldon was disinherited from decedent's estate (Prob.Code, § 259). The trial court made a specific finding that Sheldon acted with recklessness, oppression, fraud and malice, entitling Lynelle to…”
Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U.S. 429 (1968).
· cites it 2× “" Cal. Prob. Code § 259 , added by Stats. 1941, c.”
Est. of Horman, 485 P.2d 785 (Cal. 1971).
“[2] Actually, the pleading did not specify the code section (see Code Civ.”
McArthur v. McArthur, 224 Cal. App. 4th 651 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014).
“” 3 As relevant here, the statute provides that a beneficiary under a will or trust shall not receive any property from a decedent’s estate if found liable for physical abuse, neglect, or financial abuse of the decedent, who was an elder or dependent adult, and shall be deemed…”
Siofletea v. State, 424 P.2d 687 (Cal. 1967).
· cites it 2× “41 Thus we are called upon to determine whether, in addition to its express requirement that United States citizens be able to inherit "on the same terms and conditions” as nationals of the foreign country, Probate Code section 259 contains a further, implied requirement that…”
Est. of Chichernea, 424 P.2d 687 (Cal. 1967).
· cites it 2× “41] Thus we are called upon to determine whether, in addition to its express requirement that United States citizens be able to inherit "on the same terms and conditions" as nationals of the foreign country, Probate Code section 259 contains a further, implied requirement that…”
Est. of Thramm, 183 P.2d 97 (Cal. Ct. App. 1947).
“The California statutes under consideration with reference to the just-mentioned findings (Prob. Code, §§ 259, 259.1 and 259.2) provided in section 259.”
Brownell v. Gebhardt, 304 P.2d 247 (Cal. Ct. App. 1956).
“The trial court ruled that the specific legacies to German beneficiaries and-the residue of the estate should be distributed to Mr.”
Goodreau v. Lowrie, 118 Cal. App. 4th 220 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 5× “In that Sheldon was found to be liable for elder abuse, the trial court found that Sheldon was disinherited from decedent’s estate (Prob. Code, § 259). The trial court made a specific finding that Sheldon acted with recklessness, oppression, fraud and malice, entitling Lynelle…”
Allen v. Markham, 156 F.2d 653 (9th Cir. 1946).
· cites it 3× “The appellants contend that the California Probate Code Sections 259, 259.”
Emanuel v. Feierman, 202 Cal. App. 2d 552 (Cal. Ct. App. 1962).
“) The question of receipt does not turn primarily upon the provisions of Soviet law as to its recognition of the reciprocal right of American citizens to collect Soviet inheritances (Prob.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.