United States v. Ne. Constr. Co., 260 U.S. 326 (1922). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Ne. Constr. Co., 260 U.S. 326 (1922). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
69 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kingsway Cathedral v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 711 N.W.2d 6 (Iowa 2006)
Treatment trajectory · 1923 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1923 1974 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
67 L. Ed. at 289 holding that firing, and imminent threat of firing, of navy coastal guns over plaintiff’s property imposed a servitude upon the plaintiff’s land and thus amounted to a taking of some interest for public use1 citing case1 citing court put it this way
  • Kingsway Cathedral v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 711 N.W.2d 6 (Iowa 2006).published
    (holding that firing, and imminent threat of firing, of navy coastal guns over plaintiff’s property imposed a servitude upon the plaintiff’s land and thus amounted to a taking of some interest for public use)
67 L. Ed. at 329 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Benson v. State, 2006 S.D. 8, 710 N.W.2d 131.published 10 cites
    Id. at 328 , 43 S.Ct. at 136 , 67 L.Ed. 287 . [¶ 50.] The facts as pleaded by the plaintiff in Portsmouth II and its companion cases included the mounting of a large battery of cannons “with the intention of firing them over the claimant’s…
67 L. Ed. at 330 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Benson v. State, 2006 S.D. 8, 710 N.W.2d 131.published 10 cites
    Id. at 328 , 43 S.Ct. at 136 , 67 L.Ed. 287 . [¶ 50.] The facts as pleaded by the plaintiff in Portsmouth II and its companion cases included the mounting of a large battery of cannons “with the intention of firing them over the claimant’s…
At page 329 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Benson v. State, 2006 S.D. 8, 710 N.W.2d 131.published 10 cites
    Id. at 328 , 43 S.Ct. at 136 , 67 L.Ed. 287 . [¶ 50.] The facts as pleaded by the plaintiff in Portsmouth II and its companion cases included the mounting of a large battery of cannons “with the intention of firing them over the claimant’s…
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Northeastern Construction Company
122.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1922.
Published opinion
260 U.S. 326
1922 U.S. LEXIS 2371
Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, Spécial Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Beck was on the brief, for the United States., Mr. George A. King, with whom Mr. William B. King and Mr. George R. Shields were on the brief, for appellee.
McKenna.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 70%
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)
[*327] Mr. Justice McKenna

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Judgment in this case was rendered at the same time as that in Mason & Hanger Co. v. United States, just decided, ante, 323.

The amounts only are different. In that case it was $2,500 — in this case it is $150. In both, the amounts represented premiums on bonds and depend upon the same considerations. ' On the authority of the Mason & Hanger Co. Case the judgment of the Court of Claims in this case is

Affirmed.