Carter v. Roadway Express, Inc., 26 F. App'x 353 (4th Cir. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Carter v. Roadway Express, Inc., 26 F. App'x 353 (4th Cir. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frank CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INCORPORATED, LOCAL UNION 28; Local Union 28, Defendants-Appellees
01-1981.
Docket on CourtListener (RECAP)
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Feb 11, 2002.
Unpublished opinion
26 F. App'x 353
Frank Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Allison Phinney, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, Greenville, South Carolina; James Francis Wallington, Baptiste & Wilder, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Widener, Williams, Motz.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM.

Frank Carter appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Roadway Express, Inc., and Local Union 28 in this action alleging employment discrimination and breach of the union’s duty of fair representation. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 2000e-2 (1994); 29 U.S.C. § 158 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Carter v. Roadway Express, Inc., No. CA-99-3121-6-24AK (D.S.C. July 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.