Pullins v. State, 777 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Pullins v. State, 777 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Jackson v. State, 803 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 451 “hale claims are cognizable in rule 3.800(a) motions if the claim can be established on the face of the record.”3 citing cases1 citing court quotes it
  • Jackson v. State, 803 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).published
    (Hale claims are cognizable in 3.800(a) motions if the claim can be established on the face of the record.)
  • Johnson v. Moore, 801 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).published
    The petition alleges that the trial court erred in imposing five consecutive habitual felony offender life sentences for armed robbery because the crimes did not occur in five separate episodes and further alleges that "[t]he record clearl…
  • Phipps v. State, 806 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).published
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Samuel M. PULLINS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
1D00-2447.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb 9, 2001.
Published opinion
777 So. 2d 451
2001 WL 111049
Per Curiam.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 85%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)

Appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Samuel M. Pullins, appeals the denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion. He claims that his consecutive habitual offender sentence is illegal under Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993). This Court has held that Hale claims are cognizable in 3.800(a) motions if the claim can be established on the face of the record. See Valdes v. State, 765 So.2d 774 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). As Appellant has failed to point to any part of the record which[*452] establishes that the crimes were committed in a single episode, we affirm the trial court's denial of relief. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

ERVIN, BOOTH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.