Pages v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., Bd. of Med., 542 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Pages v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., Bd. of Med., 542 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Shah v. Department of Health (fladistctapp, 2002-01-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Shah v. Department of Health
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pages v. Department of Prof'l Regulation, Bd. of Med., 542 So.2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Van Ore v. Board of Med.
discussed Cited "see" Hanley v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pages v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medicine, 542 So.2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Bernal v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medicine, 517 So.2d 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Sakhuja v. Department of Professional Regulation
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Van Ore v. Board of Medical Examiners, 489 So.2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); see also, Pages v. Department of Professional Regulation, 542 So.2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beltran J. PAGES, M.D., Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellee.
88-2141.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 2, 1989.
542 So. 2d 456
1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2338
1989 WL 43357
Schwartz, C.J., Barkdull, J., and James C. Dauksch, Jr., Associate Judge.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published

Dunn, Dresnick, Lodish & Miller and Mark A. Dresnick, Miami, and Helen L. Stone, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Lisa S. Nelson, Bill O'Neil, Jonathan King, Stephanie A. Daniel, and Kenneth E. Easley, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., BARKDULL, J., and JAMES C. DAUKSCH, Jr., Associate Judge.

JAMES C. DAUKSCH, Jr., Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of appellee suspending appellant from the practice of medicine for three years and for probation for an indefinite period thereafter. The evidence amply supports the penalty recommended by the hearing officer, to six months suspension and a fine and two years probation. In order for the appellee to increase the penalty, as it did, it is necessary to comply with Section 120.57(1)(b)(10), Florida Statutes (1987). See Bernal v. Department of Professional Regulation, 517 So.2d 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), affirmed, 531 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1988). It is necessary for the Board of Medicine to conduct a "review of the complete record ..." and state "with particularity its reasons" for increasing the penalty "... in the order, by citing to the record in justifying the action." That was not done here and that failure requires reversal. We reverse the order increasing the penalty and remand the matter to the Board of Medicine for entry of a proper order. Upon remand the Board may want to reconsider, or be[*457] prepared to justify, its "indefinite," potentially lifetime, probation requirement.

Penalty order reversed; remanded.