severity hearing (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

severity hearing in Florida

6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
James Harold Peterson and Paula Peterson v. City of Plymouth, Minnesota Michael Ridgley David Lindman Mark Bevins Steven Scollard and Scott Kluckgreen
ca8 · 1991 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018Compare, e.g., Peterson v. City of Plymouth, 945 F.2d 1416, 1421 (8th Cir. 1991) (holding that allegations of "illness, sleeplessness, humiliation, anxiety, mental anguish, and loss of reputation" were insufficient under Minnesota law, which construes the severity requirement "very restrictively"), with Haverbush v. Powelson, 551 N.W.2d 206, 235-36 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996) (affirming judgment on intentional infliction claim where the plaintiff testified that he was fearful, concerned that the - 10 - defendant would interfere with his wedding, and worried about his reputation and that the defendan

11
Haverbush v. Powelsongreen
michctapp · 1996 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018Compare, e.g., Peterson v. City of Plymouth, 945 F.2d 1416, 1421 (8th Cir. 1991) (holding that allegations of "illness, sleeplessness, humiliation, anxiety, mental anguish, and loss of reputation" were insufficient under Minnesota law, which construes the severity requirement "very restrictively"), with Haverbush v. Powelson, 551 N.W.2d 206, 235-36 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996) (affirming judgment on intentional infliction claim where the plaintiff testified that he was fearful, concerned that the - 10 - defendant would interfere with his wedding, and worried about his reputation and that the defendan

11
Red Mendoza v. Borden, Inc., D.B.A. Borden's Dairygreen
ca11 · 1999 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006Mendoza, 195 F.3d at 1246 ( citing Harris, 510 U.S. at 21-22 ).

11
Mazzoni v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 1997 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001See Mazzoni, 686 So.2d at 746 (holding in part that a claimant with multiple impairments is entitled to have her impairments evaluated in combination).

11
Merrill Lynch v. HALLMARK INDUSTRIESgreen
fladistctapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
1 sentence

2000See Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital, Inc. v. Hallmark Industries, Inc., 627 So.2d 12 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); S.B.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Maldonado v. Publix Supermarkets green
fladistctapp · 2006
1 sentence

2018“An analysis of the severity factors includes a subjective and objective component, in that the employee must subjectively perceive the harassment as sufficiently severe and pervasive to alter the terms or conditions of employment, and the subjective perception must be objectively reasonable.” Id.

12018–2018
Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. green
scotus · 1993
1 sentence

2006Mendoza, 195 F.3d at 1246 ( citing Harris, 510 U.S. at 21-22 ).

12006–2006
Bernal v. DEPT. OF PROF. REGULATION green
fladistctapp · 1987
1 sentence

1990The decisions of O'Connor v. Department of Professional Regulation, Construction Industry Licensing Board, 566 So.2d 549 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Pluto v. Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate, 538 So.2d 539 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Pages v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medicine, 542 So.2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Bernal v. Department of Professional Regulation, 517 So.2d 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), affirmed, 531 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1988); Van Ore v. Board of Medical Examiners, 489 So.2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); and Hutson v. Casey, 484 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986),

11990–1990
DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION v. Bernal green
fla · 1988
1 sentence

1990The decisions of O'Connor v. Department of Professional Regulation, Construction Industry Licensing Board, 566 So.2d 549 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Pluto v. Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate, 538 So.2d 539 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Pages v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medicine, 542 So.2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Bernal v. Department of Professional Regulation, 517 So.2d 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), affirmed, 531 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1988); Van Ore v. Board of Medical Examiners, 489 So.2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); and Hutson v. Casey, 484 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986),

11990–1990
Van Ore v. Board of Medical Examiners green
fladistctapp · 1986
1 sentence

1990The decisions of O'Connor v. Department of Professional Regulation, Construction Industry Licensing Board, 566 So.2d 549 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Pluto v. Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate, 538 So.2d 539 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Pages v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medicine, 542 So.2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Bernal v. Department of Professional Regulation, 517 So.2d 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), affirmed, 531 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1988); Van Ore v. Board of Medical Examiners, 489 So.2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); and Hutson v. Casey, 484 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986),

11990–1990
O'Connor v. Dept. of Pro. Regulation, Const. Industry Licensing Bd. neutral
fladistctapp · 1990
1 sentence

1990The decisions of O'Connor v. Department of Professional Regulation, Construction Industry Licensing Board, 566 So.2d 549 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Pluto v. Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate, 538 So.2d 539 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Pages v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medicine, 542 So.2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Bernal v. Department of Professional Regulation, 517 So.2d 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), affirmed, 531 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1988); Van Ore v. Board of Medical Examiners, 489 So.2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); and Hutson v. Casey, 484 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986),

11990–1990
Hutson v. Casey green
fladistctapp · 1986
1 sentence

1990The decisions of O'Connor v. Department of Professional Regulation, Construction Industry Licensing Board, 566 So.2d 549 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Pluto v. Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate, 538 So.2d 539 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Pages v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medicine, 542 So.2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Bernal v. Department of Professional Regulation, 517 So.2d 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), affirmed, 531 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1988); Van Ore v. Board of Medical Examiners, 489 So.2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); and Hutson v. Casey, 484 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986),

11990–1990
Pages v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medicine green
fladistctapp · 1989
1 sentence

1990The decisions of O'Connor v. Department of Professional Regulation, Construction Industry Licensing Board, 566 So.2d 549 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Pluto v. Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate, 538 So.2d 539 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Pages v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medicine, 542 So.2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Bernal v. Department of Professional Regulation, 517 So.2d 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), affirmed, 531 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1988); Van Ore v. Board of Medical Examiners, 489 So.2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); and Hutson v. Casey, 484 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986),

11990–1990
Pluto v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION DIV. OF REAL ESTATE neutral
fladistctapp · 1989
1 sentence

1990The decisions of O'Connor v. Department of Professional Regulation, Construction Industry Licensing Board, 566 So.2d 549 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Pluto v. Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate, 538 So.2d 539 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Pages v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medicine, 542 So.2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Bernal v. Department of Professional Regulation, 517 So.2d 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), affirmed, 531 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1988); Van Ore v. Board of Medical Examiners, 489 So.2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); and Hutson v. Casey, 484 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986),

11990–1990

Where else courts name it

KY 31 (1979–2026) OH 27 (1905–2026) NC 19 (1975–2021) IL 19 (1883–2024) NY 13 (1888–2007) DC 13 (1987–2023) CA 10 (2013–2025) PA 8 (1915–2024) TX 7 (1993–2018) FL 6 (1990–2018) IA 6 (1970–2026) MO 5 (1987–2018) MA 5 (1902–2023) IN 4 (1937–2026) CO 4 (1941–2015) NM 4 (1994–2017) MD 4 (1961–2017) UT 4 (2000–2018) RI 3 (1996–2004) MT 3 (2010–2010) GA 3 (1989–1995) TN 3 (2009–2012) OK 3 (1998–2015) OR 3 (1982–2022) WA 2 (2006–2006) ID 2 (1905–2005) LA 2 (1976–1993) MI 2 (1853–2022) CT 2 (1992–1995) WI 2 (2002–2004) MN 2 (1890–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check