Gospel Missions of Am. v. City of Los Angeles, California, 540 U.S. 948 (2003).

Gospel Missions of Am. v. City of Los Angeles, California, 540 U.S. 948 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment Issue: collateral order doctrineMD ↗ 2.7 score

G Cite

cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, 2009–2014 · …the doctrine may be entertained only in extraordinary circumstances

10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: Copeland Corp. v. Choice Fabricators, Inc. (ohsd, 2005-09-19)

Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

2004 2015 2026

Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Copeland Corp. v. Choice Fabricators, Inc.

S.D. Ohio · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also, Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Still N The Water Publishing, 327 F.3d 472, 478 (6th Cir.) (“Dismissal [when an evidentiary hearing has not been held] is proper only if all the specific facts which the plaintiff ... alleges collectively fail to state a prima facie case for jurisdiction”) (internal quotation marks and cita *787 tions omitted), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 948 , 124 S.Ct. 399 , 157 L.Ed.2d 279 (2003).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Holley-Adkins v. Holley

S.D. Ohio · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also, Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Still N The Water Publishing, 327 F.3d 472, 478 (6th Cir.) (“Dismissal [when an evidentiary hearing has not been held] is proper only if all the specific facts which the plaintiff ... alleges collectively fail to state a prima facie case for jurisdiction”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 948 , 124 S.Ct. 399 , 157 L.Ed.2d 279 (2003).

examined Cited "see, e.g." Headwaters Inc., an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation Forest Conservation Council v. U.S. Forest Service (4×)

9th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low

"In the case of a judgment entered by confession, consent, or default, none of the issues is actually litigated ...” [Id., comment e, at 257], Arizona v. California, 530 U.S. 392, 414 , 120 S.Ct. 2304 , 147 L.Ed.2d 374 (2000) (first alteration in original); see also Gospel Missions of Am. v. City of Los Angeles, 328 F.3d 548 , 553 (9th Cir.2003), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 398 , 157 L.Ed.2d 279 (2003).