United States v. Perez, No. 99-10613 (5th Cir. Feb. 17, 2000). · Go Syfert
United States v. Perez, No. 99-10613 (5th Cir. Feb. 17, 2000). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Perez
99-10613.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 17, 2000.
Unpublished opinion
Unpublished
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10613
Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY PASTOR PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:98-CR-100-1-Y
--------------------
February 17, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Anthony Perez (“Perez”) appeals the sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He argues that the district court erred in increasing his base offense level five levels, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(C), for possessing a firearm during the bank robbery.

We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate record. Perez has failed to demonstrate that the district court clearly erred in its finding that he possessed a firearm during

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. the bank robbery. See United States v. McCarty, 36 F.3d 1349, 1360 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.