Pinero v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc, 783 N.E.2d 895 (N.Y. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Pinero v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc, 783 N.E.2d 895 (N.Y. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (42 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mei Cai Chen v. Everprime 84 Corp., 34 A.D.3d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2006)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CAJ H. PINERO, Appellant,
v.
RITE AID OF NEW YORK, INC., Respondent.
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 12, 2002.
Published opinion
783 N.E.2d 895
Published

[*542] Robert J. Tolchin, New York City, for appellant.

Friedberg & Raven, LLP, New York City (Scott Gurtman of counsel), for respondent.

Michaels & Smolak, P.C., Auburn (Michael G. Bersani of counsel), for New York State Trial Lawyers Association, amicus curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY, ROSENBLATT and GRAFFEO.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division properly determined that plaintiff's accident was not within the reasonably foreseeable risks of the defendant's alleged negligence (see, Di Ponzio v Riordan, 89 NY2d 578, 583-584).