green
Positive treatment
Issue: corporate claimDE ↗
Issue: core defenseDE ↗
Issue: multiplicity doctrineDE ↗
Quoted verbatim 2×
25.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…has discretion to look at an overbroad demand and either identify the records that should be produced or to decide that it will not 'pick through the debris' of an impermissibly overbroad demand that abuses the . . . process.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…none of these revisions adequately address the court's concern as to the breadth of the original demand sued upon or the scope of relief highland select continues to seek.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Deborah Pettry and Gail Friedt v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
none of these revisions adequately address the court's concern as to the breadth of the original demand sued upon or the scope of relief highland select continues to seek.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Deborah Pettry and Gail Friedt v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
none of these revisions adequately address the court's concern as to the breadth of the original demand sued upon or the scope of relief highland select continues to seek.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Wilkerson v. State
Wilkerson’s arguments to the contrary, relying on the 1973 Commentary, are unavailing given the plain meaning of the statutory language. 67 State v. Baker, 720 A.2d 1139, 1144 (Del. 1998) (quoting Richardson v. State, 673 A.2d 144 , 145–46 (Del. 1996)). 68 Mills v. State, 201 A.3d 1163, 1168 (Del. 2019) (“We have also held that . . . issues of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo.”); Arnold v. State, 49 A.3d 1180 , 1183 (Del. 2012) (“This Court reviews questions of statutory interpretation de novo.”); Baker, 720 A.2d at 1144 (“Statutory construction ‘involves a purely …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
White v. State
Mills, 201 A.3d at 1169 (“Because this is a pure statutory interpretation issue, the standard of review is effectively de novo.”) (citing Patrick v. State, 922 A.2d 415 , 2007 WL 773387, at *2 (Del. 2007) (TABLE)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Patrick v. Phelps
Patrick v. State, 922 A.2d 415 (Table), 2007 WL 773387, at *1 (Del.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Buchanan v. State
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Id. (citing Patrick v. State, 2007 WL 773387, at *3 (Del.)). 19 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Andrews v. State
Patrick v. State, 2007 WL 773387, at *2 (Del.) (Table). 32 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dolan v. State
Patrick v. State, 2007 WL 773387, *2 (Del.) (Table). 8 .
examined
Cited "see"
Mills v. State
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Therefore, just one conviction for resisting arrest with force or violence would have qualified Mills as a habitual offender. 5 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932). 6 See Zugehoer v. State , 980 A.2d 1007 , 1013 (Del. 2009). 7 Wainwright v. State , 504 A.2d 1096 , 1100 (Del. 1986). 8 Handy v. State , 803 A.2d 937 , 940 (Del. 2002) ; accord Zugehoer v. State , 980 A.2d 1007 , 1013 (Del. 2009) (quoting Handy , 803 A.2d at 940 ). 9 See Patrick v. State , 922 A.2d 415 , 2007 WL 773387 , at *2 (Del. 2007) (TABLE) ("[We] find that if the trial judge misinterpreted the resisting arrest …
discussed
Cited "see"
Harper v. State
(2×)
See Patrick v. State, 922 A.2d 415 , 2007 WL 773387, at *3 (Del.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Technologies Corp. v. Treppel
See, e.g., Highland Select Equity Fund, L.P. v. Motient Corp., 906 A.2d 156, 164-65 (Del.Ch.2006), aff'd 922 A.2d 415 (Del.2007); Seinfeld v. Verizon Communications, 909 A.2d 117, 122 (Del.2006) ("The evolution of Delaware’s jurisprudence in section 220 actions reflects judicial efforts to maintain a proper balance between the rights of shareholders to obtain information based upon credible allegations of corporation mismanagement and the rights of directors to manage the business of the corporation without undue interference from stockholders.”); see also Balotti & Finkelstein, § 7.47, a…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PATRICK
v.
STATE.
v.
STATE.
170, 2006.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Mar 15, 2007.
Cited by 25 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Chancery of Delaware (2)
Decision without published opinion. AFFIRMED.