Eric Samuel Tucker v. State, No. 01-15-00274-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 18, 2015). · Go Syfert
Eric Samuel Tucker v. State, No. 01-15-00274-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 18, 2015). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eric Samuel Tucker
v.
State
01-15-00274-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas.
Aug 18, 2015.
Published opinion
Published
Citation check: this opinion cites a case at a citation that does not lead to it (marked in red below).

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Eric Samuel Tucker v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-00274-CR

Trial court case number: 1428697

Trial court: 184th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Eric Samuel Tucker, acting pro se, has filed (1) a “Motion to Suppress Evidence (Deadly Weapon),” (2) a “Motion to Set Aside Indictment; Arrest Judgment,” (3) a “Motion for Oral Argument Request,” and (4) a “Motion for Forensics Report Review.” We dismiss the motions.

The trial court found appellant guilty of the felony offense of aggravated assault-family member, serious bodily injury, and assessed punishment at confinement for thirty years. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02 (Vernon 2011). On the day appellant was sentenced, the trial court appointed Cheri Duncan, Harris County Public Defender’s Office, to represent appellant on appeal. Appellant is not entitled to hybrid representation, i.e., “representation partly by counsel and partly by self.” Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.2d 919, 921[incorrect citation]–22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); see Scheanette v. State, 144 S.W.3d 503, 505 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Because appellant is represented by counsel and not entitled to hybrid representation, we dismiss appellant’s motions.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

Acting individually

Date: August 18, 2015