George Sing Louie v. Robert Carnevale, 443 F.2d 912 (9th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
George Sing Louie v. Robert Carnevale, 443 F.2d 912 (9th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George Sing LOUIE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert CARNEVALE Et Al., DefendantsAppellees
26731.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 2, 1971.
Published opinion
443 F.2d 912
1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9889
George Sing Louie, in pro. per. Michael J. Brady, of Ropers, Majeski, Kohn, Bentley & Wagner, Redwood City, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Hamley, Koelsch, Per Curiam, Trask.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for inspection and copying under Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P.

The order being interlocutory, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117, 26 S.Ct. 356, 50 L.Ed. 686 (1906); Lampman v. United States District Court, 418 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919, 90 S.Ct. 926, 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970). [1]

1

. There is some doubt whether this appeal has been properly docketed. The ruling on this notice of appeal shall not relieve appellant of his duty to properly docket the appeal in the principal action as provided in Rule 12, Fed.R.App.P.