United States v. Eduardo Osuna-Lorona, 448 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Eduardo Osuna-Lorona, 448 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Eduardo OSUNA-LORONA, Defendant-Appellant
26338_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Sep 30, 1971.
Published opinion
448 F.2d 1355
1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7820
Rush G. Glick, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty,, Robert H. Filsinger, Chief, Criminal Division, Phillip W. Johnson, Special Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Koelsch, Carter, Choy.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The judgment and conviction in this narcotics case for transporting and facilitating the sale of 10 ounces of heroin is affirmed. The district court’s resolution of conflicting facts concerning the admissibility of appellant's statement must be sustained on appeal, and the 10 year sentence he received does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Gallego v. United States, 276 F.2d 914, 917-918 (9 Cir. 1960); Black v. United States, 269 F.2d 38, 43 (9 Cir. 1959).