neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
published
Issue: opportunity for a broader inquiryPA ↗
0.1 score
Cited for
No citing cases on record.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Windisch, Appellant,
v.
First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
v.
First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Appeal, 369.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan 7, 1932.
Published opinion
H. James Sautter , with him Raymond J. Sicer , for appellant.
Richard Kingsbury Stevens , of Stradley, Ronon, Stevens Denby , for appellee.
Frazer, Simpson, Kephart, Schaefer, Maxey, Drew.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Per Curiam,
We are of opinion that this is not a ease “clear and free from doubt,” this being so, the order discharging the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense is affirmed: Colonial Securities Co. v. Levy et al. (No. 2), 302 Pa. 329, 331; Sharples v. Northampton Trans. Co., 303 Pa. 211, 212; Chelten Avenue Building Corp. v. Mayer, 306 Pa. 225; Penna. Co. for Insurances, etc., v. Bergson, 307 Pa. 44.
The order of the court below is affirmed.