Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Pennsylvania opinions name it 6 courts 1924–1950 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rodgers v. Mann
neutral
2 sentences1950Where a proper judicial determination of the controversy would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings, a rule for judgment is properly discharged: Rodgers v. Mann, 307 Pa. 452 (1932). 1946Where a proper judicial determination of the controversy would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings, the rule for judgment is properly discharged: Rodgers v. Mann, 307 Pa. 452 . | 5 | 1935–1950 |
Windisch v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
neutral
2 sentences1935This is a case where a proper judicial determination of the controversy would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings, and is not a case in which a summary judgment should be entered: Windisch v. First Camden National Bank & Trust Co., 306 Pa. 194 ; Colonial Securities Co. v. Levy et al. 1935This is a case where a proper judicial determination of the controversy would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings and is not a case in which a summary judgment should be entered against the two individual defendants: Windisch v. First Camden National Bank & Trust Co., 306 Pa. 194 ; Colonial Securities Co. v. Levy et al. | 2 | 1935–1935 |
Colonial SEC. Co. v. Levy (No. 2)
green
2 sentences1935(No. 2), 302 Pa. 329 . 1935(No. 2), 302 Pa. 329 . | 2 | 1935–1935 |
Moy v. Colonial Finance Corp.
neutral
2 sentences1928The case is one in which the controversy may be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings : Moy v. Colonial Finance Corp., 279 Pa. 123 . 1927Where it is apparent that a proper judicial determination of the controversy between the parties would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by a plaintiff, summary judgment should not be entered: Moy v. Colonial Finance Corp., 279 Pa. 123 ; County Savings Bank v. Gillette, 273 Pa. 262 ; Mancia v. Marquette National Fire Ins. | 2 | 1927–1928 |
County Savings Bank v. Gillette
neutral
2 sentences1927Where it is apparent that a proper judicial determination of the controversy between the parties would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by a plaintiff, summary judgment should not be entered: Moy v. Colonial Finance Corp., 279 Pa. 123 ; County Savings Bank v. Gillette, 273 Pa. 262 ; Mancia v. Marquette National Fire Ins. 1924We are not convinced the court below erred in its conclusion that a proper judicial determination of the controversies between the parties would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings; therefore it did not err in discharging plaintiff’s rules: Griffith v. Sitgreaves, 81* Pa. 378; Marquis v. McKay, 216 Pa. 307 ; Beck v. Schekter, 235 Pa. 253 ; County Savings Bank v. Gillette, 273 Pa. 262 . | 2 | 1924–1927 |
Mancia v. Marquette National Fire Ins.
neutral
1 sentence1927Co., 280 Pa. 174 . | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Marquis v. McKay
neutral
1 sentence1924We are not convinced the court below erred in its conclusion that a proper judicial determination of the controversies between the parties would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings; therefore it did not err in discharging plaintiff’s rules: Griffith v. Sitgreaves, 81* Pa. 378; Marquis v. McKay, 216 Pa. 307 ; Beck v. Schekter, 235 Pa. 253 ; County Savings Bank v. Gillette, 273 Pa. 262 . | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Beck v. Schekter
neutral
1 sentence1924We are not convinced the court below erred in its conclusion that a proper judicial determination of the controversies between the parties would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings; therefore it did not err in discharging plaintiff’s rules: Griffith v. Sitgreaves, 81* Pa. 378; Marquis v. McKay, 216 Pa. 307 ; Beck v. Schekter, 235 Pa. 253 ; County Savings Bank v. Gillette, 273 Pa. 262 . | 1 | 1924–1924 |