Rohrer v. Milk Control Bd., 186 A. 336 (Pa. 1936). · Go Syfert
Search
Rohrer v. Milk Control Bd., 186 A. 336 (Pa. 1936). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
173 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 36 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Velasquez v. Depuy, 46 Pa. D. & C.2d 587 (1969)
Treatment trajectory · 1936 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1936 1981 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
adopting the Superior Court dissent as this Court’s opinionno pin page on record · 2 citing cases listed
322 Pa. at 259 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Velasquez v. Depuy, 46 Pa. D. & C.2d 587 (1969).published
    What was said by the late President Judge Keller in the minority opinion of the Superior Court in Rohrer v. Milk Control Board, 121 Pa. Superior Ct. 281, 313 , which was adopted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 322 Pa. 257, 259, 281 (…
322 Pa. at 260 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Rigby v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 13 A.2d 89 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1939).published
    Furthermore, the principle is well established in this Commonwealth that, “as respects state legislation, in order to declare an Act of the General Assembly unconstitutional, its want of authority to pass the act must clearly appear,—to do…
322 Pa. at 265 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Milk Factors, 34 Pa. D. & C. 223 (1938).published
    In Rohrer v. Milk Control Board, 322 Pa. 257, 265 (1936), it was held: “These facts make the dairy farmer or producer dependent for his return on the use to which the dealer to whom he delivers it puts it.
322 Pa. at 266 cited at this page1 citing case
322 Pa. at 269 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Dornan v. Philadelphia Hous. Auth., 200 A. 834 (Pa. 1938).published
    See also, as to what constitutes a public purpose for which taxes may be levied: Jones v. City of Portland, 245 U. S. 217 , and Green v. Frazier, 253 U. S. 233 . 9 Linn v. Chambersburg Borough, 160 Pa. 511, 521 ; Wentz v. Philadelphia, 301…
322 Pa. at 277 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Chartiers Valley Jt. Schs. v. Allegheny Cnty. Bd. of Sch. Directors, 211 A.2d 487 (Pa. 1965).published 3 cites
    Compare Fisher’s Petition, 344 Pa. 96 , 23 A. 2d 878 (1942) (valid to authorize administrative body to fix “fair” wages, considering “cost of living”, “reasonable value of services” and “comparable” wages, etc.) ; Rohrer v. Milk Control Bo…
Other citing cases8 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rohrer
v.
Milk Control Board, Appellant
Appeal, 259.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 25, 1936.
Published opinion
186 A. 336
1936 Pa. LEXIS 794
Charles J. Margiotti , Attorney General, with him Harry Polikoff , Deputy Attorney General, and W. F. Daniels , Deputy Attorney General, for Commonwealth. Thomas Raeburn White , with him W. Hensel Brown and Richard C. Bull , for appellee. Francis Biddle , of Barnes, Biddle Myers , for interested parties, under Rule 61. Thomas W. Spofford , with him Charles Edwin Fox , for interested parties, under Rule 61. Geo. Ross Hull , for interested parties, under Rule 61.
Kephart, Schaefer, Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern, Barnes.
Cited by 90 opinions  |  Published

Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Kephart,

The majority of the members of this court, Mr. Justice Schaffer and Mr. Justice Drew dissenting, agree[*282] that the decision certified to us by the Superior Court should be reversed on the dissenting opinion written by President Judge Keller of that court, reported in 121 Pa. Superior Ct. 281. Mr. Justice Schaffer and Mr. Justice Drew are of opinion that the decision of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Parker of that court.

Judgment reversed.