Silvey's Est. v. Koppell, 91 S.E. 975 (1917). · Go Syfert
Search
Silvey's Est. v. Koppell, 91 S.E. 975 (1917). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“ought to be tried' is not the standard with which obviousness is determined”
64 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Henkel Corp. v. Coral, Inc. (ilnd, 1991-03-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1935 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1935 1980 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Henkel Corp. v. Coral, Inc.
N.D. Ill. · 1991 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
ought to be tried' is not the standard with which obviousness is determined
cited Cited "see" United States v. Elson
S.D.N.Y. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Puglisi, 790 F.2d 240, 242 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 827 , 107 S.Ct. 106 , 93 L.Ed.2d 55 (1986); Ruggiero, 726 F.2d at 924 .
cited Cited "see" In Re David C. Paulsen
Fed. Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hodosh v. Block Drug Co., Inc., 786 F.2d 1136 , 1143 n. 5, 229 USPQ 182 , 187 n. 5 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 827 , 107 S.Ct. 106 , 93 *1483 L.Ed.2d 55 (1986).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Lincoln
usnmcmilrev · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wheeler, 22 M.J. 76 (C.M.A.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 827 , 107 S.Ct. 106 , 93 L.Ed.2d 55 (1986).
cited Cited "see" United States v. George Franklin Patrick, Jr.
11th Cir. · 1993 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord United States v. Puglisi, 790 F.2d 240, 242 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 827 , 107 S.Ct. 106 , 93 L.Ed.2d 55 (1986).
cited Cited "see" State v. Cathcart
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Puglisi, 790 F. 2d 240 , 242 n. 1 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 *351 U.S. 827, 107 S.Ct. 106 , 93 L.Ed. 2d 55 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ecolochem, Inc. v. Southern California Edison Co.
C.D. Cal. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hodosh v. Block Drug Co., 786 F.2d 1136, 1142 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 827 , 107 S.Ct. 106 , 93 L.Ed.2d 55 (1986) (criticizing the district court for applying different standards for § 102 and § 103). 25 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. George Franklin Patrick, Jr.
11th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Since Patrick did not raise the issue of the type of methamphetamine until sentencing, the government was not required to offer evidence on the matter at trial. 6 Id.; see also United States v. Puglisi, 790 F.2d 240, 242 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 827 , 107 S.Ct. 106 , 93 L.Ed.2d 55 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gotti
E.D.N.Y · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Puglisi, 790 F.2d 240 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 827 , 107 S.Ct. 106 , 93 L.Ed.2d 55 (1986); United States v. Terry, 702 F.2d 299, 310 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 931 , 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed.2d 304 (1983); United States v. *548 Fury, 554 F.2d 522, 530-31 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860, 868 (2d Cir.1981).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Robert Jones, Jr.
6th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Puglisi, 790 F.2d 240, 244 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 106 , 93 L.Ed.2d 55 (1986).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hodosh v. Block Drug Co., 786 F.2d 1136, 1141 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 827 , 107 S.Ct. 106 , 93 L.Ed. 2d 55 ; S. La.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jones
6th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Puglisi, 790 F.2d 240, 244 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 106 , 93 L.Ed.2d 55 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Silvey’s Estate Et Al.
v.
Koppell Et Al.; Craddock-Terry Co. v. Same; Ward-Truitt Co. v. Same
Mar 29, 1917.
91 S.E. 975
Mr. Calhoun A. Mays , for appellants, submits: \That a nonresident who comes into the State
Fraser.
for the sole purpose of attending a litigation

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to set aside the service of a summons and complaint upon the appellants. The appellants were served with the summons and complaint while they were on trial for a criminal offense in the Federal Court held at Greenwood, in this State. The defendants are nonresidents of this State, and within the State for the purpose of standing their trials. It is conceded that, if the appellants had been engaged in the trial of a civil case, the service would have been invalid.

The respondents contend that there is a difference between the attendance of a nonresident in a civil case and the attendance of the defendant on a criminal case. The one is voluntary and the other involuntary.

There are two reasons why one in attendance .upon the trial of a cause in Court should not be served with process in another case: (1) Voluntary appearance might thereby be prevented; (2) the tendency to distract the attention of parties and witnesses from the cause then being tried. The second only applies here, and Granite Brick Co. v. Titus, 95 S. C. 47, 78 S. E. 540, is authority. See, also, Stewart v. Ramsay, 242 U. S. 128, 37 Sup. Ct. 44, 61 L. Ed. -. The second reason applies more strongly to criminal than to civil cases. If there is ever a time when a man needs the unimpeded exercise of his every faculty, it is when he[*109] is on trial for crime, and this is true whether he be guilty or not guilty.

The order appealed from is reversed.