United States v. Little, 182 F. App'x 308 (5th Cir. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Little, 182 F. App'x 308 (5th Cir. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sidney Wade LITTLE, Defendant-Appellant
05-41076.
Docket on CourtListener (RECAP)
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
May 23, 2006.
Unpublished opinion
182 F. App'x 308
Maureen Clancy Smith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Denise S. Benson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Jolly, Davis, Owen.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM: *

Sidney Wade Little appeals from his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for knowingly and intentionally possessing pseudoephedrine with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine. He argues that the district court erred by failing to award him a safety-valve adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. The district court did not err in determining that § 5C1.2 was not applicable to Little’s sentence. See United States v. Villegas, 404 F.3d 355, 359 (5th Cir.2005).

Little also contends that the district court clearly erred by attributing to him an amount of pseudoephedrine that belonged to his codefendant. The district court’s finding that Little and his codefendant were engaged in jointly undertaken criminal activity was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Ayala, 47 F.3d 688, 690 (5th Cir.1995). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.