PER CURIAM:

Demetrius Fitzgerald appeals his 240-month total sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, possessing with intent to distribute oxycodone, marijuana, and alprazolam, and possessing multiple firearms in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. Fitzgerald argues that the district court erred in treating him as an armed career criminal and a career offender because his Florida aggravated battery with a deadly weapon and resisting arrest with violence convictions were not predicate offenses under the elements clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”) and the career-offender guideline.

We review de novo whether a prior conviction qualifies as a violent felony under the ACCA or a crime of violence under the career-offender guideline. United States v. Seabrooks, 839 F.3d 1326, 1338 (11th Cir. 2016) (ACCA), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2265 (2017); United States v. Vail-Bailon, 868 F.3d 1293, 1296 (11th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (career offender), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 2620 (2018). We apply the same analysis for both ACCA violent felonies and crimes of violence under the sentencing guidelines, as they are “virtually identical.” United States v. Rainey, 362 F.3d 733, 734 (11th Cir. 2004).

A defendant who violates 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) and has at least 3 earlier convictions for violent felonies or serious drug offenses is subject to an enhanced statutory sentence of 15 years to life imprisonment. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). To qualify as a career offender a defendant must have at least two prior felony convictions for a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense. U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(a)(3). Under the elements clauses in the ACCA and career-offender guidelines, an offense is a violent felony or a crime of violence if it “has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another.” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B); U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a).

In United States v. Romo-Villalobos, we concluded that a Florida conviction for resisting arrest with violence constituted a crime of violence under the elements clause of the career-offender guideline. 674 F.3d 1246, 1249 (11th Cir. 2012). In United States v. Hill, we reaffirmed our holding in Romo-Villalobos after the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). 799 F.3d 1318, 1322-23 (11th Cir. 2015); see also United States v. Joyner, 882 F.3d 1369, 1378 (11th Cir. 2018), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. May 23, 2018) (No. 17-9128). In Turner v. Warden Coleman FCI, we concluded that a Florida conviction for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon satisfied the elements clause of the ACCA. 709 F.3d 1328, 1341 (11th Cir. 2013). We have reaffirmed

our holding in Turner after Johnson. United States v. Golden, 854 F.3d 1256, 1257 (11th Cir. 2017); In re Hires, 825 F.3d 1297, 1301 (11th Cir. 2016).

Under the prior precedent rule, we are bound by a prior binding precedent “unless and until it is overruled” by this Court en banc or by the Supreme Court. United States v. Vega-Castillo, 540 F.3d 1235, 1236 (11th Cir. 2008) (quotation marks omitted).

Here, the district court properly sentenced Fitzgerald as an armed career criminal and a career offender because his four total prior Florida convictions for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon and resisting arrest with violence are violent felonies and crimes of violence in the light of our prior precedent. See Hill, 799 F.3d at 1322 (resisting arrest with violence); Turner, 709 F.3d at 1341 (aggravated battery with a deadly weapon).

AFFIRMED.