At page 479 District courts should award such fees sparingly....5 citing cases
- Mills v. City of Norfolk, No. 2:21-cv-00185 (E.D. Va. Mar. 17, 2023).Hosp., 783 F.2d 476, 479-80 (4th Cir. 1986).
- Revak v. Miller, No. 7:18-cv-00206 (E.D.N.C. July 8, 2022).Hosp., 783 F.2d 476, 479 (4th Cir.1986); see Christiansburg Garment Co., 434 U.S. at 422-23 (“[I]t is important that a district court resist the understandable temptation to engage in post hoc reasoning by concluding that, because a plaint…
- Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Great Steaks, Inc., 667 F.3d 510 (4th Cir. 2012).published (District courts should award such fees sparingly....)
- Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Bruno's Restaurant, 976 F.2d 521 (9th Cir. 1992).published(reversing award of attorney’s fees where district court had denied motion for dismissal, found it necessary to hear evidence from both sides, and took the matter under consideration for several weeks)
- Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Anderson's Restaurant of Charlotte, Inc., Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Anderson's Restaurant of Charlotte, Inc., 958 F.2d 367 (4th Cir. 1992).unpublishedHosp., 783 F.2d 476, 479 (4th Cir.1986). 8 Similarly, we find no error in the denial of the defendant's request for additional attorney's fees in the amount of $12,250.35.
At page 477 cited at this page1 citing case
- Dunkley, No. 6:26-cv-00055 (W.D. Va. June 2, 2026).Hosp., 783 F.2d 476, 477-79 (4th Cir. 1986) (same).
At page 480 cited at this page1 citing case
- Goldstein v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 337 F. Supp. 2d 771 (E.D. Va. 2004).publishedHosp., 783 F.2d 476, 480 (4th Cir.1986), it is also true that the Chris-tiansburg analysis “comes into play only after the [civil rights] claim has been disposed of and requires the court to assess the strength or weakness of that claim vi…
Other citing cases
- Shovelin v. Cent. Nm Elec. Co-op., 850 P.2d 996 (N.M. 1993).published
- Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Jordan Graphics, Inc., 769 F. Supp. 1357 (W.D.N.C. 1991).published
- Introcaso v. Cunningham, 857 F.2d 965 (4th Cir. 1988).published
v.
John E. Bourne, Jr., and Ross F. Walker
Charles W. STALL, Jr., Appellant,
v.
John E. BOURNE, Jr., and Ross F. Walker, Appellees.
No. 84-1394.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Argued Feb. 3, 1986.
Decided Feb. 14, 1986.
(Robert N. Rosen, Rosen, Oberman, & Rosen, Samuel H. Altman, Altman & Altman, P.A. on brief), for appellant.
(James E. Gonzales, Gonzales & Gonzales on brief), for appellees.
Before WINTER, Chief Judge, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, ERVIN, CHAPMAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, sitting in banc.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided court, and the opinion of the panel heretofore filed, 774 F.2d 657, is withdrawn.
AFFIRMED.