Kenneth Richardson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. United States of Am., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Norman J. Trapp v. United States of Am., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee, 860 F.2d 357 (9th Cir. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Kenneth Richardson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. United States of Am., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Norman J. Trapp v. United States of Am., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee, 860 F.2d 357 (9th Cir. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
75 citation events (58 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. Reyes, 665 F. App'x 736 (10th Cir. 2016)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 360 Analyzing criminal responsibility and facial challenges to statutes10 citing cases[C]riminal responsibility should not attach where one could not reasonably understand that his contemplated conducl is proscribed.” (quotation marks, alteration, and citation omitted)3 citing courts put it this way · 7 listed here
At page 359 Treating separate concerns as elements for analysis4 citing cases
At page 363 Defining commercial bribery and RICO predicate elements4 citing casesrejecting a constitutional challenge to Colorado’s commercial bribery statute when used as a predicate for a RICO prosecution1 citing court put it this way
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth Richardson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant
v.
United States of America, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Norman J. Trapp v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
86-4095.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Nov 2, 1988.
Published opinion
860 F.2d 357
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 74%
Citer courts: First Circuit (1) · W.D. Oklahoma (1)

860 F.2d 357

Kenneth RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Norman J. TRAPP, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 86-4095, 86-4119 and 86-4106.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 2, 1988.

Before WRIGHT, ALARCON and POOLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

[*~357–359]1

The opinion of this court of March 14, 1988, 841 F.2d 993 (9th Cir.1988) is amended as follows:

[*~358–360]2

The last sentence of section II, 841 F.2d at 998, is amended by deleting the period and accompanying footnote nine following the word "trial," and adding the following words: " * * * on the issue of liability and the application of the Keegan standard.9 We leave to the sound discretion of the experienced trial judge the decision whether under all the circumstances there should be a full trial on other issues."

[*~362–364]3

The opinion is further amended in part IV, 841 F.2d at 1000, by striking the period following the word "trial" at the end of that paragraph and adding thereto the words "on the issue of liability and the application of the Keegan standard."