Rollins v. State, 567 S.W.2d 736 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Rollins v. State, 567 S.W.2d 736 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: PharmFlex, Inc. v. Div. of Emp. Sec., 964 S.W.2d 825 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 740 cited at this page2 citing cases
  • PharmFlex, Inc. v. Div. of Emp. Sec., 964 S.W.2d 825 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).published 2 cites
    The issue of good cause is "`addressed in the first instance to the sound discretion of the administrative agency, [as] it depends on the evaluation of many subtle factors, and that determination is subject to judicial review only for abus…
  • King v. Div. of Emp. Sec., 964 S.W.2d 832 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).published
    Comm’n, 567 S.W.2d 736, 740 (Mo.App.1978)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Henry ROLLINS
v.
STATE of Missouri
No. KCD 29498.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Jun 12, 1978.
Published opinion
567 S.W.2d 736
1978 Mo. App. LEXIS 2835
David M. Doak, Asst. Public Defender, 13th Judicial Circuit, Columbia, for appellant., John D. Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Dixon, Somerville, Turnage.
Published
PER CURIAM:

James Henry Rollins filed a motion under Rule 27.26 to vacate the judgment of conviction and sentence previously ordered for dispensing marijuana. His original conviction was affirmed in State v. Rollins, 449 S.W.2d 585 (Mo.1970).

The trial court held an evidentiary hearing and entered findings of fact and conclusions of law. A careful review of the record reveals the findings of fact are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The judgment is affirmed.