Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Todaro v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commissiongreen2 sentences1998The issue of good cause is "`addressed in the first instance to the sound discretion of the administrative agency, [as] it depends on the evaluation of many subtle factors, and that determination is subject to judicial review only for abuse of discretion.'" Todaro, 660 S.W.2d at 765 (quoting Bishop, 567 S.W.2d at 740). 1998The issue of good cause is ‘“addressed in the first instance to the sound discretion of the administrative agency, [as] it depends on the evaluation of many subtle factors, and that determination is subject to judicial review only for abuse of discretion.’” Todaro, 660 S.W.2d at 765 (quoting Bishop, 567 S.W.2d at 740). | 1 | 3 |
Rollins v. Stategreen2 sentences1998The issue of good cause is "`addressed in the first instance to the sound discretion of the administrative agency, [as] it depends on the evaluation of many subtle factors, and that determination is subject to judicial review only for abuse of discretion.'" Todaro, 660 S.W.2d at 765 (quoting Bishop, 567 S.W.2d at 740). 1998The issue of good cause is ‘“addressed in the first instance to the sound discretion of the administrative agency, [as] it depends on the evaluation of many subtle factors, and that determination is subject to judicial review only for abuse of discretion.’” Todaro, 660 S.W.2d at 765 (quoting Bishop, 567 S.W.2d at 740). | 1 | 2 |
Bishop v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commissiongreen1 sentence1999Relations Comm’n, 567 S.W.2d 736, 740 (Mo.App.1978). | 1 | 1 |
Mosca v. Missouri Department of Labor & Industrial Relations, Division of Employment Securitygreen2 sentences1998See also Mosca, 924 S.W.2d at 611 . [5] Because the Commission applied an invalid definition of "good cause" in its ruling, the matter must be remanded for the exercise of its discretion under the proper standard for "good cause." All concur. 1998See also Mosca, 924 S.W.2d at 611 . 5 Because the Commission applied an invalid definition of “good cause” in its ruling, the matter must be remanded for the exercise of its discretion under the proper standard for “good cause.” All concur. . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dugene Westbrook v. Division of Employment Security
green
2 sentences2023While “‘[t]he legislature intended to leave the initial determination as to the existence of good cause with the administrative agency,’” good cause “depends upon the evaluation of many subtle factors.” Biswas, 496 S.W.3d at 590–91 (quoting Westbrook, 456 S.W.3d at 119 ). 2016“Good *527 cause depends upon the evaluation of many subtle factors, and therefore is subject to judicial review only for abuse of discretion.” Id. | 3 | 2016–2023 |
Mita Biswas v. Division of Employment Security
green
1 sentence2023While “‘[t]he legislature intended to leave the initial determination as to the existence of good cause with the administrative agency,’” good cause “depends upon the evaluation of many subtle factors.” Biswas, 496 S.W.3d at 590–91 (quoting Westbrook, 456 S.W.3d at 119 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Charles F. Moon
green
1 sentence1978Langford v. Flemming, 276 F.2d 215 (5th Cir.1960); Gardner v. Moon, 360 F.2d 556 (8th Cir.1966). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Langford v. Flemming
green
1 sentence1978Langford v. Flemming, 276 F.2d 215 (5th Cir.1960); Gardner v. Moon, 360 F.2d 556 (8th Cir.1966). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.