At page 289 cited at this page1 citing case
- Amy Revis v. Donald Bassman, M.D., 604 S.W.3d 644 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020).published I am mindful that “[i]n determining whether the trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence, the focus is not on whether the evidence was admissible but on whether the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the evidence…
At page 290 cited at this page1 citing case
- Randolph W. Wilkins v. Off. of the Missouri Attorney Gen. & Chris Koster, 464 S.W.3d 271 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).published“Even if the trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence, this [c]ourt is loathe to vacate a jury’s verdict and resulting judgment on such grounds.” Id. “[T]o obtain a reversal based on the exclusion of evidence, an appellant m…
v.
STATE of Missouri
ORDER
PER CURIAM.Lisa K. Meyers (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Marion County denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that the motion court erred in denying her claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to present the testimony of a mental health expert concerning Movant’s mental health history at her sentencing hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).