Davis v. Chaplin, 27 S.E. 726 (Ga. 1897). · Go Syfert
Search
Davis v. Chaplin, 27 S.E. 726 (Ga. 1897). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for
q1 “was at best weak and unsatisfactory, and the decided preponderance of the testimony was on the side of the losing party.”0 citing cases2 citing courts quote it · Neutral (inherited from the case)
    Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
    Davis
    v.
    Chaplin
    Supreme Court of Georgia.
    Aug 4, 1897.
    Published opinion
    27 S.E. 726
    1897 Ga. LEXIS 636
    Joseph A. Cronk, for plaintiff. Charlton, Machall & Anderson and Garrard, Meldrim & Newman, for defendants.
    Cobb.
    Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
    Cobb, J.

    This court will not reverse a judgment granting a second new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to evidence, when it appears-from the record that the evidence in support of the verdict was. at best weak and unsatisfactory, and the decided preponderance of the testimony was on the side pf the losing party. - - .

    Judgment .affirmed.

    All the Justices concurring. Equitable petition. Before Judge Falligant. Chatham superior court. December term, 1896. Joseph A. Cronk, for plaintiff. Charlton, Machall & Anderson and Garrard, Meldrim & Newman, for defendants.