State v. Miller, 429 P.3d 388 (Or. 2018). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Miller, 429 P.3d 388 (Or. 2018). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“we acknowledge that the cases we cite regarding gross negligence were subject to de novo review. although they employed a different standard of review of the facts, the legal principles delineated in those cases are still relevant to our analysis.”
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Abolish Abortion Oregon v. City of Grants Pass (ord, 2022-03-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2018 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2018 2022 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Abolish Abortion Oregon v. City of Grants Pass
D. Or. · 2022 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
for the same reasons that the content-neutral application of ors 166.025(1)(b) to defendant's amplified speech does not run afoul of article i, section 8, it also passes muster under the first amendment 'time, place or manner' analysis.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Hammond v. Hammond
Or. Ct. App. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
we acknowledge that the cases we cite regarding gross negligence were subject to de novo review. although they employed a different standard of review of the facts, the legal principles delineated in those cases are still relevant to our analysis.
cited Cited "see" State v. Rossiter
Or. Ct. App. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Covington, 291 Or App 514 , 422 P3d 276 , rev den, 363 Or 727 (2018).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
MILLER, Pamila Sue
A158433(S066058).
Oregon Supreme Court.
Oct 4, 2018.
429 P.3d 388
Allow, Duncan.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 90%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (1) · D. Oregon (1)
Duncan, J., would allow.