How cited: State v. Miller · Go Syfert

State v. Miller (2018)

green · 20 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2018 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201820222026
Quote Authority · D. Or.
App. 771, 778 (2018), review denied, 363 Or. 727 (2018) (“For the same reasons that the content-neutral application of ORS 166.025(1)(b) to defendant's amplified speech does not run afoul of Article I, section 8, it also passes muster under the First Amendment ‘time, place or manner’ analysis.”) (quoting Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 US 781, 791 (1989)).
“For the same reasons that the content-neutral application of ORS 166.025(1)(b) to defendant's amplified speech does not run afoul of Article I, section 8, it also passes muster under the First Amendment ‘time, place or manner’ analysis.”
green Hammond v. Hammond (2019)
Quote Authority · Or. Ct. App.
App. 522 , 533 n 4, 422 P.3d 314 , rev. allowed , 363 Or. 727 , 429 P.3d 384 (2018) ("We acknowledge that the cases we cite regarding gross negligence were subject to de novo review.
"We acknowledge that the cases we cite regarding gross negligence were subject to de novo review. Although they employed a different standard of review of the facts, the legal principles delineated in those cases are still relevant to our analysis."
green State v. Rossiter (2019)
Cited · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see
See State v. Covington, 291 Or App 514 , 422 P3d 276 , rev den, 363 Or 727 (2018).