At page 1386 cited at this page1 citing case
- Fisher v. Mayfield, 505 N.E.2d 975 (Ohio 1987).published Co., supra. In Mullins at 20-21, 15 OBR at 17, 471 N.E. 2d at 1386, this court stated: “* * * It is the belief of this court, however, that such an inflexible standard as was set forth in Rockwell and Cadle is not appropriate in all circum…
Other citing cases
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Gross, 478 N.E.2d 792 (Ohio 1985).published
v.
Bryant
After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (4) and (6), DR 5-105(A); DR 6-101 (A)(3); DR 6-102(A); DR 9-102(A)(1) and (2); and DR 9-102(B)(1) and (3).
It is the judgment of this court that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.