State v. Malone, 824 P.2d 430 (Or. Ct. App. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Malone, 824 P.2d 430 (Or. Ct. App. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF OREGON
v.
ANTHONY JAMES MALONE
C89-09-34962; CA A63943.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Jan 22, 1992.
Published opinion
824 P.2d 430
1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 236
Peter Gartlan, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem., Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Buttler, Muniz, Rossman.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of compelling prostitution, ORS 167.017, and promoting prostitution. ORS 167.012. He argues that the trial court erred in not merging the convictions. He seeks vacation of his conviction for promoting prostitution.

Offenses do not merge if proof of each offense requires proof of an element that the other does not. ORS 161.067. ORS 167.012(1)(c) — defining the crime of promoting prostitution — requires proof that the defendant received or agreed to receive money or other property derived from prostitution, which is not an element of the crime of compelling prostitution. ORS 167.017(1)(b) — defining the crime of compelling prostitution — requires proof that the defendant’s victim was under the age of 18. That is not an element of promoting prostitution.

Defendant committed crimes requiring proof of different statutory elements. The trial court properly declined to merge the convictions. See State v. Wallock/Hara, 110 Or App 109, 821 P2d 435 (1991).

Affirmed.