State v. Baker, 117 P.3d 300 (Or. Ct. App. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Baker, 117 P.3d 300 (Or. Ct. App. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Judith D. Baker, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON
v.
JUDITH D. BAKER
30-04-16615; A126301.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Jul 27, 2005.
Published opinion
117 P.3d 300
2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 906
James A. Palmer filed the brief for appellant., Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Anna M. Joyce, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Armstrong, Brewer, Landau.
Published
PER CURIAM

In this civil commitment case, the trial court found that appellant is a danger to herself and to others because of a mental disorder. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A). On appeal, appellant argues that the evidence in the record is not sufficient to support the trial court’s findings. The state concedes that, based on the clear and convincing evidence standard that the statute requires, ORS 426.130, the evidence is insufficient. After reviewing the record, we conclude that appellant and the state are correct.

Reversed.