No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of O. K., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON
v.
O. K.
v.
O. K.
050565440; A128894.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Aug 15, 2007.
Published opinion
Caryanne Conner filed the brief for appellant., Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Edmonds, Sercombe, Wollheim.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself because of her mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A) (defining “mentally ill person” as a person who, because of a mental disorder, is “[d]angerous to self or others”). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.
Reversed.