State v. D. R. B., 298 P.3d 639 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. D. R. B., 298 P.3d 639 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of D. R. B., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON
v.
D. R. B.
11664MC; A150388.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Mar 20, 2013.
Published opinion
298 P.3d 639
Susan D. Isaacs filed the brief for appellant., Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Jake J. Hogue, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Hadlock, Ortega, Sercombe.
Published
PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. In his second assignment of error, he contends that the trial court erred in concluding that he is a danger to others as a result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed.[1] We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse on that basis. Accordingly, we do not address appellant’s first and third assignments of error.

Reversed.

1

In particular, “the state concedes that the trial court erred in relying on [certain] hearsay statements for their truth, and basing its decision on those statements."