No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of R. A., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON
v.
R. A.
v.
R. A.
120768154; A152295.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
May 30, 2013.
Published opinion
302 P.3d 482
2013 WL 2389839
2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 647
Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant., Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Inge D. Wells, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Duncan, Schuman, Wollheim.
Published
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.
Reversed.