No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of L. L. T., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON
v.
L. L. T.
v.
L. L. T.
120464418; A151521.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Jun 19, 2013.
Published opinion
303 P.3d 1015
2013 WL 3149370
2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 697
Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant., Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and David B. Thompson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Duncan, Schuman, Wollheim.
Published
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is unable to provide for his basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.
Reversed.