green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
12.4 score
“sovereign immunity also protects the tribes against enforcement of subpoenas.”
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
sovereign immunity also protects the tribes against enforcement of subpoenas.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Del Campo v. Kennedy
See Ceballos, 361 F.3d at 1182-83 ; Bishop Paiute Tribe v. County of Inyo, 275 F.3d 893, 908 (9th Cir.2002), rev’d on other grounds, 538 U.S. 701 , 123 S.Ct. 1887 , 155 L.Ed.2d 933 (2003).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. Ryan
Cf. Bishop Paiute Tribe v. County of Inyo, 275 F.3d 893, 902 (9th Cir.2002) (holding that execution of warrant against tribe to obtain employee records violated tribal immunity because “at issue is not just the Tribe’s right to protect the confidentiality of its employee records, but the more fundamental right of the Tribe not to have its policies undermined by the states and their political subdivisions”), vacated on other grounds sub nom.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Village of Union Springs
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Bishop Paiute Tribe v. County of Inyo, 275 F.3d 893, 903 (9th Cir.2002), vacated and remanded on other grounds, Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community of the Bishop Colony, 538 U.S. 701 , 123 S.Ct. 1887 , 155 L.Ed.2d 933 (2003).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Venegas v. County of Los Angeles
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Bishop Paiute Tribe, 275 F.3d at 907, 910; Brewster, 275 F.3d at 806 .
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Moreno Avalos Cortez Mauricio Robert Avalos Terry Leach Lydia Avalos Guillermo Avalos Kathy Granillo v. County of Los Angeles
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Bishop Paiute Tribe, 275 F.3d at 907, 910; Brewster, 275 F.3d at 810 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Narragansett Indian v. State of Rhode Islan
See also Bishop Paiute Tribe v. County of Inyo, 275 F.3d 893 (9th Cir.2002) (holding that execution of warrant against a tribe to obtain employee records violated tribal sovereign immunity), vacated on other grounds sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Narragansett Indian v. State of Rhode Islan
See also Bishop Painte Tribe v. County of Inyo, 275 F.3d 893 (9th Cir.2002) (holding that execution of warrant against a tribe to obtain employee records violated tribal sovereign immunity), vacated on other grounds sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard Ceballos v. Gil Garcetti Frank Sundstedt Carol Najera County of Los Angeles
(2×)
See, e.g., Bishop Paiute Tribe v. County of Inyo, 275 F.3d 893, 906-10 (9th Cir.2002) (reviewing state constitution and statutes and concluding that district attorney and sheriff acted as county officials in obtaining and executing search warrant), vacated on other grounds, 538 U.S. 701 , 123 S.Ct. 1887 , 155 L.Ed.2d 933 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
At & T Corporation v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe
(2×)
See, e.g., Bishop Paiute Tribe v. County of Inyo, 275 F.3d 893, 900-01 (9th Cir.2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tornquist v. Spirit Mountain Gaming, Inc.
See also Bishop Paiute Tribe v. County of Inyo, 275 F.3d 893, 902 (9th Cir.2002) (“As one of the only means by which the Tribe can generate income and be self-sufficient, management of the Casino is uniquely part of the Tribe’s government and infrastructure”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
At & T Corporation v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe
(2×)
See, e.g., Bishop Paiute Tribe v. County of Inyo, 275 F.3d 893, 900-01 (9th Cir.2002).
Adelaide ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TRW INC., Defendant-Appellee
v.
TRW INC., Defendant-Appellee
98-56624.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 28, 2001.
On Remand from United States Supreme Court
ORDER
The district court’s decision is AFFIRMED. TRW Inc. v. Andrews, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 441, 151 L.Ed.2d 339 (2001).