34 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1987–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Ingramgreen2 sentences2011Finally, Moody argues that applying the preclusions in Rules 32.2(a)(3) and (a)(5) to his claims of ineffective assistance of pretrial counsel conflicts with established caselaw from both the Alabama Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court, specifically Ex parte Ingram, supra, and Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500 , 123 S.Ct. 1690 , 155 L.Ed.2d 714 (2003). 2006As we have stated: "If the appellant was convicted before the Alabama Supreme Court's decision in [ Ex parte] Ingram , [ 675 So.2d 863 (Ala. 1996),] newly appointed appellate counsel could have presented claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in a motion for new trial filed pursuant to Ex parte Jackson , 598 So.2d 895 (Ala. 1992). | 3 | 5 |
Ex Parte Jacksonred2 sentences1995He asserts that initial appellate counsel was ineffective on the following grounds: (1) Fondren first asserts that, although counsel did in fact assert ineffectiveness of trial counsel in a motion for a new trial, as amended, he failed to follow the procedures set forth in Ex parte Jackson, 598 So.2d 895 (Ala.1992), and that such failure procedurally baiTed Fondren from pursuing the ineffective claim alleged in the motions. (2) Fondren further asserts that initial appellate counsel was ineffective because more egregious examples of ineffectiveness of trial counsel would have been discovered ha 1995I concur in the majority’s holding that when newly appointed counsel seeks to use the procedure set forth in Ex parte Jackson, 598 So.2d 895 (Ala.1992), it should make no difference whether the notice of appeal was given first or the Jackson motion was filed first. | 2 | 7 |
Ex Parte Singletongreen2 sentences2000(Jackson's brief to this court, p. 54.) The trial court gave the following instruction regarding Jackson's statement to police: "Evidence has been introduced concerning alleged statements made by the defendant, and while I determine the voluntariness of the statements, the jury determines their weight or credibility and you may disregard any alleged statement which you find to be unworthy of belief or which you entertain a reasonable doubt as to the truth of these statements." (R. 654.) In addressing an identical issue in Jackson v. State, 674 So.2d 1318 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993), aff'd. in pertinent 2000(Jackson’s brief to this court, p. 54.) The trial court gave the following instruction regarding Jackson’s statement to police: “Evidence has been introduced concerning alleged statements made by the defendant, and while I determine the voluntariness of the statements, the jury determines their weight or credibility and you may disregard any alleged statement which you find to be unworthy of belief or which you entertain a reasonable doubt as to the truth of these statements.” (R. 654.) In addressing an identical issue in Jackson v. State, 674 So.2d 1318 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), affd. in pertinent p | 2 | 2 |
Stewart v. Alabamagreen2 sentences2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. *999 App.1998), rev'd on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Hyde v. State, 778 So.2d 199 (Ala.Cr.App.1998). 2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. | 2 | 2 |
Fisher v. A. D. T. Security Systemgreen2 sentences2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. *999 App.1998), rev'd on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Hyde v. State, 778 So.2d 199 (Ala.Cr.App.1998). 2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. | 2 | 2 |
Green v. Carolinagreen2 sentences2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. *999 App.1998), rev'd on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Hyde v. State, 778 So.2d 199 (Ala.Cr.App.1998). 2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. | 2 | 2 |
Ex Parte Stewartgreen2 sentences2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. *999 App.1998), rev'd on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Hyde v. State, 778 So.2d 199 (Ala.Cr.App.1998). 2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. | 2 | 2 |
Lockett v. Ohiogreen2 sentences2000See Rule 45A, Ala.R.App.P. “‘A sentencer in a capital case may not refuse to consider or be “precluded from considering” mitigating factors.’ Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 , 102 S.Ct. 869 , 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982)(quoting Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 604 , 98 S.Ct. 2954 , 57 L.Ed.2d 973 (1978)). 2000See Rule 45A, Ala.R.App.P. “‘A sentencer in a capital case may not refuse to consider or be “precluded from considering” mitigating factors.’ Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 , 102 S.Ct. 869 , 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982)(quoting Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 604 , 98 S.Ct. 2954 , 57 L.Ed.2d 973 (1978)). | 2 | 2 |
Siebert v. Stategreen2 sentences2000He contends only that "many of the veniremembers had ... been exposed to pretrial publicity." (Jackson's brief to this court, p. 105.) "`"The relevant question is not whether the community remembered the case, but whether the jurors at [the accused's] trial had such fixed opinions that they could not judge impartially the guilt of the defendant." Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025, 1035 , 104 S.Ct. 2885, 2891 , 81 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).'" Siebert v. State, 562 So.2d 586, 589 (Ala.Cr.App. 1989), aff'd, 562 So.2d 600 (Ala.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 398 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), quoting F 2000He contends only that “many of the veniremembers had ... been exposed to pretrial publicity.” (Jackson’s brief to this court, p. 105.) “ ‘ “The relevant question is not whether the community remembered the case, but whether the jurors at [the accused’s] trial had such fixed opinions that they could not judge impartially the guilt of the defendant.” Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025, 1035 , 104 S.Ct. 2885, 2891 , 81 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).’ ” Siebert v. State, 562 So.2d 586, 589 (Ala.Cr.App.1989), aff'd, 562 So.2d 600 (Ala.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 398 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), quoting | 2 | 2 |
McCray v. Stategreen2 sentences2000The record reflects that the trial court held a hearing on Jackson's motion to suppress on January 16, 1997; however, Jackson failed to include a transcript of that hearing in the record on appeal. "`It is the appellant's duty to provide this court with a complete record on appeal.'" McCray v. State, 629 So.2d 729, 733 (Ala. Cr.App.1993). 2000The record reflects that the trial court held a hearing on Jackson’s motion to suppress on January 16, 1997; however, Jackson failed to include a transcript of that hearing in the record on appeal. “ ‘It is the appellant’s duty to provide this court with a complete record on appeal.’ ” McCray v. State, 629 So.2d 729, 733 (Ala.Cr.App.1993). | 2 | 2 |
| Jewitt v. Arizonagreen | 2 | 2 |
Goff v. Texasgreen2 sentences2000See Ex parte Windsor, 683 So.2d 1042 (Ala. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1171 , 117 S.Ct. 1438 , 137 L.Ed.2d 545 (1997); Woods v. State, 789 So.2d 896 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Jackson v. State, [Ms. CR-97-2050, May 28, 1999] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Cr.App. 1999); Sneed v. State, 783 So.2d 841 (Ala. Cr.App.1999); Maples v. State, 758 So.2d 1 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 758 So.2d 81 (Ala. 1999); Hardy v. State, [Ms. CR-95-0589, March 26, 1999] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Cr. 2000See Ex parte Windsor, 688 So.2d 1042 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1171 , 117 S.Ct. 1438 , 137 L.Ed.2d 545 (1997); Woods v. State, 789 So.2d 896 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Jackson v. State, [Ms. CR-97-2050, May 28, 1999] — So.2d - (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Sneed v. State, 783 So.2d 841 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Maples v. State, 758 So.2d 1 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 758 So.2d 81 (Ala.1999); Hardy v. State, [Ms. CR-95-0589, March 26, 1999] — So.2d - (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 111 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr.App.1998), rev’d on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Smith v. State, 756 So.2d 892, 904 (Ala.Cr.App.1 | 2 | 2 |
| Eddings v. Oklahomagreen | 2 | 2 |
| Etheredge v. Genie Industries, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| White v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Zumbado v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Edgar v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Lane v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Newsome v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Gavin v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| McKinney v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Seaton v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Pate v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Edward Carver v. Paulette Carver, Gasper L. Toole, Iii, Frampton W. Toole, Iii, and Richard L. Pearcegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Ex Parte Worksgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Ex Parte Coulliettegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Gibson v. Zantgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Johnson v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Ex Parte Troutman Sanders, LLPgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Ex Parte Frithgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Jackson v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Crawford v. Washingtongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Minor v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Broadnax v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Dobyne v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
| Ex Parte Duren green | 2 | 2000–2000 |
| Duren v. State green | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Drinkard v. State
green
2 sentences2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. *999 App.1998), rev'd on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Hyde v. State, 778 So.2d 199 (Ala.Cr.App.1998). 2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Ex Parte Drinkard
green
2 sentences2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. *999 App.1998), rev'd on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Hyde v. State, 778 So.2d 199 (Ala.Cr.App.1998). 2000See Ex parte Windsor, 688 So.2d 1042 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1171 , 117 S.Ct. 1438 , 137 L.Ed.2d 545 (1997); Woods v. State, 789 So.2d 896 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Jackson v. State, [Ms. CR-97-2050, May 28, 1999] — So.2d - (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Sneed v. State, 783 So.2d 841 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Maples v. State, 758 So.2d 1 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 758 So.2d 81 (Ala.1999); Hardy v. State, [Ms. CR-95-0589, March 26, 1999] — So.2d - (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 111 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr.App.1998), rev’d on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Smith v. State, 756 So.2d 892, 904 (Ala.Cr.App.1 | 2 | 2000–2000 |
John Edward Swindler, V
green
2 sentences2000He contends only that "many of the veniremembers had ... been exposed to pretrial publicity." (Jackson's brief to this court, p. 105.) "`"The relevant question is not whether the community remembered the case, but whether the jurors at [the accused's] trial had such fixed opinions that they could not judge impartially the guilt of the defendant." Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025, 1035 , 104 S.Ct. 2885, 2891 , 81 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).'" Siebert v. State, 562 So.2d 586, 589 (Ala.Cr.App. 1989), aff'd, 562 So.2d 600 (Ala.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 398 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), quoting F 2000He contends only that “many of the veniremembers had ... been exposed to pretrial publicity.” (Jackson’s brief to this court, p. 105.) “ ‘ “The relevant question is not whether the community remembered the case, but whether the jurors at [the accused’s] trial had such fixed opinions that they could not judge impartially the guilt of the defendant.” Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025, 1035 , 104 S.Ct. 2885, 2891 , 81 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).’ ” Siebert v. State, 562 So.2d 586, 589 (Ala.Cr.App.1989), aff'd, 562 So.2d 600 (Ala.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 398 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), quoting | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Ex Parte Sockwell
green
2 sentences2000In Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), aff'd, 675 So.2d 38 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 67 (1996), we addressed an identical argument and stated: "While some of the factual matters in the trial court's sentencing order were not based upon evidence contained in the record, we hold that error in the trial court's sentencing order is not so egregious as to require a new sentencing order. 2000In Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), aff'd, 675 So.2d 38 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 67 (1996), we addressed an identical argument and stated: “While some of the factual matters in the trial court’s sentencing order were not based upon evidence contained in the record, we hold that error in the trial court’s sentencing order is not so egregious as to require a new sentencing order. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Sockwell v. State
green
2 sentences2000In Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), aff'd, 675 So.2d 38 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 67 (1996), we addressed an identical argument and stated: "While some of the factual matters in the trial court's sentencing order were not based upon evidence contained in the record, we hold that error in the trial court's sentencing order is not so egregious as to require a new sentencing order. 2000In Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), aff'd, 675 So.2d 38 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 67 (1996), we addressed an identical argument and stated: “While some of the factual matters in the trial court’s sentencing order were not based upon evidence contained in the record, we hold that error in the trial court’s sentencing order is not so egregious as to require a new sentencing order. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Woods v. State
green
2 sentences2000See Ex parte Windsor, 683 So.2d 1042 (Ala. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1171 , 117 S.Ct. 1438 , 137 L.Ed.2d 545 (1997); Woods v. State, 789 So.2d 896 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Jackson v. State, [Ms. CR-97-2050, May 28, 1999] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Cr.App. 1999); Sneed v. State, 783 So.2d 841 (Ala. Cr.App.1999); Maples v. State, 758 So.2d 1 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 758 So.2d 81 (Ala. 1999); Hardy v. State, [Ms. CR-95-0589, March 26, 1999] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Cr. 2000See Ex parte Windsor, 688 So.2d 1042 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1171 , 117 S.Ct. 1438 , 137 L.Ed.2d 545 (1997); Woods v. State, 789 So.2d 896 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Jackson v. State, [Ms. CR-97-2050, May 28, 1999] — So.2d - (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Sneed v. State, 783 So.2d 841 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Maples v. State, 758 So.2d 1 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 758 So.2d 81 (Ala.1999); Hardy v. State, [Ms. CR-95-0589, March 26, 1999] — So.2d - (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 111 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr.App.1998), rev’d on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Smith v. State, 756 So.2d 892, 904 (Ala.Cr.App.1 | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Loggins v. State
green
2 sentences2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. *999 App.1998), rev'd on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Hyde v. State, 778 So.2d 199 (Ala.Cr.App.1998). 2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
| Ex Parte Fortenberry green | 2 | 2000–2000 |
| Fortenberry v. State green | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Cavender v. Miller
green
2 sentences2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. *999 App.1998), rev'd on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Hyde v. State, 778 So.2d 199 (Ala.Cr.App.1998). 2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
| Smith v. Alabama green | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Sockwell v. Alabama
green
2 sentences2000In Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), aff'd, 675 So.2d 38 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 67 (1996), we addressed an identical argument and stated: "While some of the factual matters in the trial court's sentencing order were not based upon evidence contained in the record, we hold that error in the trial court's sentencing order is not so egregious as to require a new sentencing order. 2000In Sockwell v. State, 675 So.2d 4 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), aff'd, 675 So.2d 38 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 838 , 117 S.Ct. 115 , 136 L.Ed.2d 67 (1996), we addressed an identical argument and stated: “While some of the factual matters in the trial court’s sentencing order were not based upon evidence contained in the record, we hold that error in the trial court’s sentencing order is not so egregious as to require a new sentencing order. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
| Stewart v. Gramley green | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Minor v. State
green
2 sentences2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. *999 App.1998), rev'd on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Hyde v. State, 778 So.2d 199 (Ala.Cr.App.1998). 2000See, e.g., Ex parte Stewart, 730 So.2d 1246 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 846 , 120 S.Ct. 119 , 145 L.Ed.2d 101 (1999); Ex parte Smith, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 , 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999); Minor v. State, 780 So.2d 707 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 777 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
| Ex Parte Jackson green | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Jackson v. State
green
2 sentences2000(Jackson's brief to this court, p. 54.) The trial court gave the following instruction regarding Jackson's statement to police: "Evidence has been introduced concerning alleged statements made by the defendant, and while I determine the voluntariness of the statements, the jury determines their weight or credibility and you may disregard any alleged statement which you find to be unworthy of belief or which you entertain a reasonable doubt as to the truth of these statements." (R. 654.) In addressing an identical issue in Jackson v. State, 674 So.2d 1318 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993), aff'd. in pertinent 2000(Jackson’s brief to this court, p. 54.) The trial court gave the following instruction regarding Jackson’s statement to police: “Evidence has been introduced concerning alleged statements made by the defendant, and while I determine the voluntariness of the statements, the jury determines their weight or credibility and you may disregard any alleged statement which you find to be unworthy of belief or which you entertain a reasonable doubt as to the truth of these statements.” (R. 654.) In addressing an identical issue in Jackson v. State, 674 So.2d 1318 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), affd. in pertinent p | 2 | 2000–2000 |
| United States v. Richard Floyd Inman green | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Nathaniel Clifton v. United States
green
2 sentences2000Clifton v. United States, 371 F.2d 354 (D.C.Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 995 , 87 S.Ct. 1312 , 18 L.Ed.2d 341 (1967); United States v. *1021 Inman, 352 F.2d 954 (4th Cir.1965). 2000Clifton v. United States, 371 F.2d 354 (D.C.Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 995 , 87 S.Ct. 1312 , 18 L.Ed.2d 341 (1967); United States v. Inman, 352 F.2d 954 (4th Cir.1965). | 2 | 2000–2000 |
| O'Day v. United States green | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Clifton v. United States
green
2 sentences2000Clifton v. United States, 371 F.2d 354 (D.C.Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 995 , 87 S.Ct. 1312 , 18 L.Ed.2d 341 (1967); United States v. *1021 Inman, 352 F.2d 954 (4th Cir.1965). 2000Clifton v. United States, 371 F.2d 354 (D.C.Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 995 , 87 S.Ct. 1312 , 18 L.Ed.2d 341 (1967); United States v. Inman, 352 F.2d 954 (4th Cir.1965). | 2 | 2000–2000 |
In Re Maples v. State
green
2 sentences2000See Ex parte Windsor, 683 So.2d 1042 (Ala. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1171 , 117 S.Ct. 1438 , 137 L.Ed.2d 545 (1997); Woods v. State, 789 So.2d 896 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Jackson v. State, [Ms. CR-97-2050, May 28, 1999] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Cr.App. 1999); Sneed v. State, 783 So.2d 841 (Ala. Cr.App.1999); Maples v. State, 758 So.2d 1 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 758 So.2d 81 (Ala. 1999); Hardy v. State, [Ms. CR-95-0589, March 26, 1999] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Cr. 2000See Ex parte Windsor, 688 So.2d 1042 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1171 , 117 S.Ct. 1438 , 137 L.Ed.2d 545 (1997); Woods v. State, 789 So.2d 896 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Jackson v. State, [Ms. CR-97-2050, May 28, 1999] — So.2d - (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Sneed v. State, 783 So.2d 841 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Maples v. State, 758 So.2d 1 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 758 So.2d 81 (Ala.1999); Hardy v. State, [Ms. CR-95-0589, March 26, 1999] — So.2d - (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 111 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr.App.1998), rev’d on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Smith v. State, 756 So.2d 892, 904 (Ala.Cr.App.1 | 2 | 2000–2000 |
| Maples v. State green | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Ex Parte Siebert
green
2 sentences2000He contends only that "many of the veniremembers had ... been exposed to pretrial publicity." (Jackson's brief to this court, p. 105.) "`"The relevant question is not whether the community remembered the case, but whether the jurors at [the accused's] trial had such fixed opinions that they could not judge impartially the guilt of the defendant." Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025, 1035 , 104 S.Ct. 2885, 2891 , 81 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).'" Siebert v. State, 562 So.2d 586, 589 (Ala.Cr.App. 1989), aff'd, 562 So.2d 600 (Ala.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 398 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), quoting F 2000He contends only that “many of the veniremembers had ... been exposed to pretrial publicity.” (Jackson’s brief to this court, p. 105.) “ ‘ “The relevant question is not whether the community remembered the case, but whether the jurors at [the accused’s] trial had such fixed opinions that they could not judge impartially the guilt of the defendant.” Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025, 1035 , 104 S.Ct. 2885, 2891 , 81 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).’ ” Siebert v. State, 562 So.2d 586, 589 (Ala.Cr.App.1989), aff'd, 562 So.2d 600 (Ala.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 398 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), quoting | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Sneed v. State
green
2 sentences2000See Ex parte Windsor, 683 So.2d 1042 (Ala. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1171 , 117 S.Ct. 1438 , 137 L.Ed.2d 545 (1997); Woods v. State, 789 So.2d 896 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Jackson v. State, [Ms. CR-97-2050, May 28, 1999] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Cr.App. 1999); Sneed v. State, 783 So.2d 841 (Ala. Cr.App.1999); Maples v. State, 758 So.2d 1 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 758 So.2d 81 (Ala. 1999); Hardy v. State, [Ms. CR-95-0589, March 26, 1999] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Cr. 2000See Ex parte Windsor, 688 So.2d 1042 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1171 , 117 S.Ct. 1438 , 137 L.Ed.2d 545 (1997); Woods v. State, 789 So.2d 896 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Jackson v. State, [Ms. CR-97-2050, May 28, 1999] — So.2d - (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Sneed v. State, 783 So.2d 841 (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Maples v. State, 758 So.2d 1 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 758 So.2d 81 (Ala.1999); Hardy v. State, [Ms. CR-95-0589, March 26, 1999] — So.2d - (Ala.Cr.App.1999); Drinkard v. State, 111 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr.App.1998), rev’d on other grounds, 777 So.2d 295 (Ala.2000); Smith v. State, 756 So.2d 892, 904 (Ala.Cr.App.1 | 2 | 2000–2000 |
| Ex Parte Smith green | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Patton v. Yount
green
2 sentences2000He contends only that “many of the veniremembers had ... been exposed to pretrial publicity.” (Jackson’s brief to this court, p. 105.) “ ‘ “The relevant question is not whether the community remembered the case, but whether the jurors at [the accused’s] trial had such fixed opinions that they could not judge impartially the guilt of the defendant.” Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025, 1035 , 104 S.Ct. 2885, 2891 , 81 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).’ ” Siebert v. State, 562 So.2d 586, 589 (Ala.Cr.App.1989), aff'd, 562 So.2d 600 (Ala.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 398 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), quoting 2000He contends only that “many of the veniremembers had ... been exposed to pretrial publicity.” (Jackson’s brief to this court, p. 105.) “ ‘ “The relevant question is not whether the community remembered the case, but whether the jurors at [the accused’s] trial had such fixed opinions that they could not judge impartially the guilt of the defendant.” Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025, 1035 , 104 S.Ct. 2885, 2891 , 81 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).’ ” Siebert v. State, 562 So.2d 586, 589 (Ala.Cr.App.1989), aff'd, 562 So.2d 600 (Ala.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 398 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), quoting | 2 | 2000–2000 |
| City of St. George v. Foremaster green | 2 | 2000–2000 |
| Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc. green | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts
green
2 sentences2000He contends only that "many of the veniremembers had ... been exposed to pretrial publicity." (Jackson's brief to this court, p. 105.) "`"The relevant question is not whether the community remembered the case, but whether the jurors at [the accused's] trial had such fixed opinions that they could not judge impartially the guilt of the defendant." Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025, 1035 , 104 S.Ct. 2885, 2891 , 81 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).'" Siebert v. State, 562 So.2d 586, 589 (Ala.Cr.App. 1989), aff'd, 562 So.2d 600 (Ala.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 398 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), quoting F 2000He contends only that “many of the veniremembers had ... been exposed to pretrial publicity.” (Jackson’s brief to this court, p. 105.) “ ‘ “The relevant question is not whether the community remembered the case, but whether the jurors at [the accused’s] trial had such fixed opinions that they could not judge impartially the guilt of the defendant.” Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025, 1035 , 104 S.Ct. 2885, 2891 , 81 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).’ ” Siebert v. State, 562 So.2d 586, 589 (Ala.Cr.App.1989), aff'd, 562 So.2d 600 (Ala.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 398 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), quoting | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Johnson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences2000He contends only that "many of the veniremembers had ... been exposed to pretrial publicity." (Jackson's brief to this court, p. 105.) "`"The relevant question is not whether the community remembered the case, but whether the jurors at [the accused's] trial had such fixed opinions that they could not judge impartially the guilt of the defendant." Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025, 1035 , 104 S.Ct. 2885, 2891 , 81 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).'" Siebert v. State, 562 So.2d 586, 589 (Ala.Cr.App. 1989), aff'd, 562 So.2d 600 (Ala.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 398 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), quoting F 2000He contends only that “many of the veniremembers had ... been exposed to pretrial publicity.” (Jackson’s brief to this court, p. 105.) “ ‘ “The relevant question is not whether the community remembered the case, but whether the jurors at [the accused’s] trial had such fixed opinions that they could not judge impartially the guilt of the defendant.” Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025, 1035 , 104 S.Ct. 2885, 2891 , 81 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).’ ” Siebert v. State, 562 So.2d 586, 589 (Ala.Cr.App.1989), aff'd, 562 So.2d 600 (Ala.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 963 , 111 S.Ct. 398 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), quoting | 2 | 2000–2000 |
| Webb v. State neutral | 2 | 1995–1996 |
| Thompson v. State green | 1 | 2025–2025 |
| Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| Anderson v. Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc. green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| Thompson v. Gardner green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Duren v. Missouri green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Jackson v. State green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Ex Parte Jackson green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.