Logan v. State, 555 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). · Go Syfert
Logan v. State, 555 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
Quick Summary

A defendant has no constitutional right to bail after a guilty verdict is rendered but before final judgment is pronounced.

A petitioner seeking habeas corpus relief argues that he is entitled to reasonable bail after a guilty verdict but before being adjudicated guilty, pursuant to the state constitution. The court considers whether the constitutional right to bail remains applicable after a verdict is rendered. The court holds that following a constitutional amendment effective January 1, 1983, the right to bail applies only to pretrial release and detention. Under current rules, a trial court possesses the discretion to place a defendant in custody after a guilty verdict is rendered and before final judgment is pronounced. The petitioner failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion.

2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas Deron LOGAN
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 89-2202.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov 9, 1989.
Published opinion
555 So. 2d 875
1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6402
1989 WL 136810
Craig Stephen Boda, Daytona Beach, for petitioner., No appearance for respondent.
Cowart, Daniel, Harris.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
COWART, Judge.

This is a proceeding for habeas corpus to secure post-trial release. A verdict of guilty was rendered against the petitioner who had been at large on bail prior to trial. The trial court did not adjudicate the petitioner guilty after the verdict was rendered, but directed that petitioner be taken into custody and committed to the proper official. The petitioner argues that under Article I, Section 14 of the Constitution of the State of Florida, he was entitled to release on reasonable bail until adjudicated guilty, citing Hancock v. State, 386 So.2d 613 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). For the reasons stated below, we deny the writ.

The petitioner’s argument was correct prior to January 1, 1983, when Article I, Section 14 of the Florida Constitution was amended as a result of the November, 1982 general election.[1] The present provision relates only to pretrial release and detention. Under the current constitution, there is no right to bail after a verdict of guilty has been rendered. Under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.550, after a verdict of guilty is rendered and before final judgment is pronounced, the court has the power and discretion to place a defendant in custody. Until there exists a basis to appeal under section 924.06, Florida Statutes (1987) or Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b), there can be no appeal and a defendant is not entitled to post-trial release under either Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.691(a) or Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(e).

The petitioner has failed to show that the trial court abused its discretion in remanding him to custody at this stage of the criminal proceeding rather than continuing his bail.

WRIT DENIED.

DANIEL, C.J., and HARRIS, J., concur.
1

Prior to January 1, 1983, Article I, Section 14 provided that "Until adjudicated guilty, every person charged with a crime ... shall be entitled to release on reasonable bail ...”