Ensign Bank, F.S.B. v. South Florida Warehousing II, 582 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). · Go Syfert
Ensign Bank, F.S.B. v. South Florida Warehousing II, 582 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
Cited for
At page 166 cited at this page1 citing case
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ENSIGN BANK, F.S.B.
v.
SOUTH FLORIDA WAREHOUSING II etc.
No. 91-0671.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jul 10, 1991.
Published opinion
582 So. 2d 165
1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6674
1991 WL 120866
Peter H. Levitt and Suzanne H. Youmans of Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Miami, for appellant., Martin E. Wall, Vero Beach, for appel-lees.
Farmer, Gunther, Warner.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the award of attorney’s fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1989). The appellant claims it made an honest mistake in adding appellee and its lands to a mortgage foreclosure suit. While it appears that the attorney may have made an honest mistake, relying on an erroneous title examination, we cannot say the same for the appellant bank itself. Approximately two years before the commencement of this action it had executed a partial release of its mortgage as to appel-lee’s land when the mortgagor sold the parcels to the appellee in this appeal. A simple review of the bank’s own files should have revealed this to the bank so that these properties and appellee would have been excluded. This is tantamount to a finding that, as concerns the bank, the suit against appellee was brought recklessly without investigation of its own records and with complete absence of justiciable fact or law. See Galbraith v. Inglese, 402 So.2d 574 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

GUNTHER, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.