McLeod v. State, 583 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
McLeod v. State, 583 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Willie McLEOD
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 90-1234.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 28, 1991.
Published opinion
583 So. 2d 1046
1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6785
1991 WL 115153
Barbara M. Linthicum, Public Defender, Paula S. Saunders, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Bradley R. Bischoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
Barfield, Nimmons, Only, Shivers.
Published
SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals his enhanced sentence pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes, arguing that the trial court erred in classifying him as a habitual offender based on five prior convictions rendered on the same date. In light of this court’s recent holding in Barnes v. State, 576 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), that habitual offender classification must be based on sequential convictions, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

NIMMONS, J., concurs. BARFIELD, J., concurs in result only.

[*1047] ON MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330(a), we grant the appellee’s motion for certification and amend our previous opinion to include certification pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v) of the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida as one of great public importance:

WHETHER SECTION 775.084(1)(A)1, FLORIDA STATUTES (Supp.1988), WHICH DEFINES HABITUAL FELONY OFFENDERS AS THOSE WHO HAVE “PREVIOUSLY BEEN CONVICTED OF TWO OR MORE FELONIES IN THIS STATE OR OTHER QUALIFIED OFFENSES,” REQUIRES THAT EACH OF THE FELONIES BE COMMITTED AFTER CONVICTION FOR THE IMMEDIATELY PREVIOUS OFFENSE?
SHIVERS, NIMMONS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.